论监察调查中鉴定措施的运用  

On Application of Identification Measures in Supervision Investigation

作　　者：朱兰[1] 付琳 Zhu Lan;Fu Lin(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120;Guizhou Police College,Guiyang,Guizhou 550000)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120 [2]贵州警察学院,贵州贵阳550000

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2021年第1期93-99,共7页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

摘　　要：《监察法》赋予监察机关监督、调查与处置三项权利。监察调查权是指监察机关对国家公职人员涉嫌贪污贿赂、滥用职权和玩忽职守等违纪、职务违法和职务犯罪行为进行调查的权力。调查措施包括鉴定、留置、讯问、查封、扣押等。但《监察法》未对监察机关的鉴定措施设置任何限制性规范,对于鉴定人、鉴定机构的资质,鉴定材料的来源和资格,鉴定意见的形式要件等也没有作出明确规范,这些问题势必影响鉴定措施的可操作性,使鉴定措施的作用受到消减。因此,对于监察调查中鉴定措施的具体运用进行研究势在必行。The Supervision Law gives supervisory organs three powers:supervision,investigation and disposal.The power of supervision and investigation refers to the power of supervision organs to investigate the behaviors of state public officials involving corruption,bribery,abuse of power and dereliction of duty,such as violation of discipline,duty violation and duty crime.The investigation measures include identification,retention,interrogation,sealing up,detention,etc.However,the Supervision Law does not set any restrictive norms for the appraisal measures of supervision organs,nor does it make clear norms for the qualifications of appraisers and appraisal institutions,the sources and qualifications of appraisal materials,and the formal requirements of appraisal opinions.These problems are bound to affect the operation of appraisal measures and dwarf the role of appraisal measures.Therefore,it is imperative to study the specific operation of identification measures in supervision and investigation.

关 键 词：监察调查 鉴定措施 运用 规范化 

分 类 号：DF794[政治法律—诉讼法学]