基于来源原则的《高等学校档案实体分类法》反思  

作　　者：王子鹏 

机构地区：[1]江苏开放大学

出　　处：《档案管理》2021年第3期68-71,73,共5页Archives Management

摘　　要：《高等学校档案实体分类法》(DA/T 10-1994)已被废止,档案界须直面一个问题:为何基于事由原则的行业标准能够指导高校档案实践近30年?该《分类法》重新演绎事由原则困境且非人力所及,高校档案管理早已变相回归来源原则。在后《分类法》时代,高校档案实践将回归常识、融入体系,教育部和国家档案局应聚焦高校特有档案类型制定行业标准。以“范式”为手段进行理论反思,认为“档案整理层面的研究”已形成“来源原则范式”,解决实践困惑依赖于拓展来源原则适用尺度,并警惕非范式理论过早应用于实践。The"University PH(pH)ysical Archives Classification"(DA/T 10-1994)has been abolished,and the archival academic community must face a question:Why can industry standards based on the principle of pertinence guide the practice of Archives in colleges and universities for nearly 30 years?The"Classification"re-interprets the principle of pertinence of difficulty and is beyond the reach of human resources,and university Archives management has long returned to the principle of provenance in disguise.In the post-classification era,the practice of Archives in colleges and universities will return to common sense and be integrated into the system.The Ministry of Education and the International Archives should focus on the unique types of Archives in colleges and universities to formulate industry standards.Using"paradigm"as a means to carry out theoretical reflection,it is believed that"research on the level of Archives management"has formed a"provenance principle paradigm",and solving practical confusion depends on expanding the application scale of the provenance principle,and beware of the premature application of non-paradigm theory to practice.

关 键 词：来源原则 针对性原则 大学档案 范式 《分类法》 

分 类 号：G647.24[文化科学—高等教育学]