血管内取栓治疗超时间窗缺血性卒中患者的临床疗效  

Clinical effect of endovascular thrombectomy in the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke beyond time window

作　　者：韦恒宇 黄丹丹[1] 邱观养[1] Wei Hengyu;Huang Dandan;Qiu Guanyang(Department of Neurology,the People's Hospital of Gaozhou City,Guangdong Province,Guangdong Gaozhou 525200)

机构地区：[1]广东省高州市人民医院神经内科,广东高州525200

出　　处：《中国社区医师》2021年第13期62-63,共2页Chinese Community Doctors

摘　　要：目的:分析血管内取栓治疗超时间窗缺血性卒中患者的临床疗效。方法:2019年1月-2020年6月收治超时间窗缺血性卒中患者38例,随机分为两组,各19例。对照组采用保守治疗;观察组采用机械取栓治疗。比较两组患者治疗效果、卒中评分和并发症发生率。结果:观察组治疗后mRS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗后卒中评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:超时间窗缺血性卒中患者接受血管内取栓治疗时,卒中恢复效果更好,同时并发症更少。Objective:To explore the clinical effect of endovascular thrombectomy in the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke beyond time window.Methods:From January 2019 to June 2020,38 patients with ischemic stroke beyond time window were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 19 cases in each group.The control group was treated with conservative treatment.The observation group was treated with mechanical thrombectomy.We compared the stroke score and complication rate between the two groups.Results:In the observation group,after treatment,mRS score was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In the observation group,the incidence of complications was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In the observation group,after treatment,the stroke score was lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Patients with ischemic stroke over time window are treated with endovascular thrombectomy,the recovery effect of stroke is better,and the complications are less.

关 键 词：血管内取栓治疗 超时间窗缺血性卒中 并发症 机械取栓 

分 类 号：R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]