检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵奇聪 宋维彬 Shao Qi-cong;Song Wei-bin
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学研究生院 [2]中国人民公安大学法学院
出 处:《苏州大学学报(法学版)》2021年第2期37-52,共16页Journal of Soochow University:Law Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“辅助证据的证据规则研究”(项目编号:19CFX044)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:被追诉人阅卷权的理论基础为控辩平等理论、有效辩护理论与程序主体理论。被追诉人阅卷权有两种立法形式,分别为大陆法系的检阅卷宗模式与英美法系的证据开示模式。二者各有长短,但就我国制度环境、改革经验与司法资源而言,宜选择建立检阅卷宗模式,兼采证据开示模式的合理因素。目前我国《刑事诉讼法》未确立真正的被追诉人阅卷权制度,但司法实践中已有被追诉人阅卷的尝试,这反映出我国被追诉人阅卷权制度的严重滞后。对此,我国宜从被追诉人阅卷权的阶段范围、实现路径与争议裁决三个方面,构建全面的被追诉人阅卷权制度。The theoretical basis of the right of accused to access case files is the prosecution and defense equality,the theory of effective defense and the theory of procedural subject.There are two kinds of legislative forms,one is inspecting dossiers model of civil law system,another is discovery model of common law system.Each has its own advantages,but in terms of Chinese institutional environment,the experience of judicial reform and resources that the preferred options could be inspect dossiers model with the reasonable factors of discovery model.The criminal procedure law has not grant the real legal rights of the accused to access case files,but there are some trials in the judicial practice which reflect the serious lag in current legal system.In view of this,China should construct a comprehensive system of the right of accused to access case files from three aspects which are right scopes of phases of lawsuit,realization path and the dispute ruling.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63