检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张冰洁 郑荣焕[2] 兰仕亮 林挺[3] ZHANG Bingjie;ZHENG Ronghuan;LAN Shiliang;LIN Ting(Fujian Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases&Department of Radiologicab School and Hospital of Stomatology,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350002,China;Department of Stomatology of Sanming Second Hospitab Sanming 366000,China;Institute of Stomatology,Fujian Medical University&Department of Preventive Dentistry,School and Hospital of Stomatology,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350002,China)
机构地区:[1]福建省口腔疾病研究重点实验室,福建医科大学口腔医学院/附属口腔医院放射科,福州350002 [2]三明市第二医院口腔科,三明366000 [3]福建医科大学口腔医学研究院,福建医科大学口腔医学院/附属口腔医院预防科,福州350002
出 处:《福建医科大学学报》2021年第2期137-140,共4页Journal of Fujian Medical University
基 金:福建省卫健委青年科研课题(2017-2-39)。
摘 要:目的应用国际龋病检查和评估系统分析氟化钠护齿剂和氟化泡沫在预防乳牙龋中的效果,并分析两种氟化物的安全性。方法采用整群随机抽样的方法,将389例儿童分为两组,对其乳牙患龋情况及接受干预的配合度情况进行调查。结果干预前氟化泡沫组和氟化钠护齿剂组的患龋率、龋均及龋病的严重程度比较,差别均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后氟化泡沫组和氟化钠护齿剂组的患龋率分别为86.01%和78.06%,龋均分别为(6.09±4.73)和(5.15±4.38),氟化泡沫组的患龋率及龋均高于氟化钠护齿剂组(χ^(2)=4.50,P<0.05;t=2.02,P<0.05)。氟化泡沫组和氟化钠护齿剂组的龋发病率分别为77.04%和48.98%,新发龋均分别为(4.35±4.15)和(1.26±1.74),氟化泡沫组的龋发病率及新发龋均高于氟化钠护齿剂组(χ^(2)=35.92,P<0.01;t=9.64,P<0.01)。干预后氟化泡沫组乳牙龋的严重情况高于氟化钠护齿剂组(Z=-4.49,P<0.01)。结论氟化钠护齿剂预防乳牙龋的效果优于氟化泡沫。Objective To evaluate the effect of sodium fluoride and fluoride foam on prevention of primary teeth caries by using International caries detection and assessment system,and to analyze the security of two kinds of fluoride,so as to provide evidence for improving children’s oral health care.Methods By using cluster sampling,389 children were divided into two groups to investigate the primary teeth caries status and the cooperation degree when accepting intervention.Results Before intervention,there was no significant difference in the caries prevalence rate,dmft and the severity of caries between these two groups(P>0.05).After intervention,the caries prevalence rate of the group of the fluoride foam and the sodium fluoride were 86.01%and 78.06%,the mean dmft were(6.09±4.73)and(5.15±4.38).The caries prevalence rate and the mean dmft of the group of fluoride foam were higher than those in the group of sodium fluoride(χ^(2)=4.50,P<0.05;t=2.02,P<0.05).The incidence rate of new caries of the group of the fluoride foam and the sodium fluoride were 77.04%and 48.98%,the mean of new caries were(4.35±4.15)and(1.26±1.74).The incidence rate and the mean of new caries of the group of fluoride foam were higher than the sodium fluoride(χ^(2)=35.92,P<0.05;t=9.64,P<0.05).The severity of primary teeth caries of the group of fluoride foam was higher than that in the group of sodium fluoride.The severity of primary teeth caries of the group of fluoride foam was higher compared to the group of sodium fluoride(Z=-4.49,P<0.01).Conclusion Sodium fluoride is better than fluoride foam on prevention of primary teeth caries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.148