检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟滔 ZHONG Tao(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120)
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《山西警察学院学报》2021年第2期5-14,共10页Journal of Shanxi Police College
基 金:国家社科基金项目“刑罚退出机制的价值确立与实践运行研究”(17XFX009);西南政法大学法学院研究生科研创新项目“技术侦查措施的规范化适用路径研究”(FXY2021040)。
摘 要:技术侦查措施的概念未在立法文本上得到清晰界定,当前建构概念与归纳特征的学理进路难以为其含义廓清提供意蕴指引。应引入“原型范畴论”探索全新进路,以隐私侵犯及其程度作为技术侦查语义范畴的认知基点,以技术性与秘密性作为辅助性判断标准。学界对技术侦查审批程序僵化、制度空间狭窄这两大问题疏于关照,应根据具体技侦措施隐私侵犯程度的差别设置精细化的审批程序,结合社会情势合理扩展技术侦查的适用外延。The concept of technical investigation measures has not been clearly defined in the legislative text.The current theoretical approach of constructing concepts and inductive features is difficult to describe its meaning accurately.This paper argues that the concept of“prototype category theory”should be introduced,with privacy infringement and its degree as the cognitive basis of the semantic category of technical investigation,and technicality and secrecy as the auxiliary judgment criteria.The academic community has neglected the two significant problems of rigid technical investigation approval procedures and narrow institutional space.Therefore,it is necessary to set up refined approval procedures according to the differences in the degree of privacy infringement of specific technical investigation measures,and rationally expand the application extension of technical investigation in light of the social situation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7