医疗损害责任纠纷中鉴定意见的证据特性——以三个典型案例为切入点  

Evidence Characteristics of Appraisal Opinions in Medical Damage Liability Dispute——Take Three Typical Cases for Example

作　　者：张林[1] 谢伟坛 ZHANG LIN;XIE WEITAN(Xizang Minzu University,Xianyang Shaanxi 712082,China)

机构地区：[1]西藏民族大学法学院,陕西咸阳712082

出　　处：《西安电子科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第4期66-73,共8页Journal of Xidian University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：鉴定意见是鉴定人运用科学知识和方法对案件事实的推理和判断,其科学性特征并不能掩盖其模糊性缺陷,况且作为鉴定材料的病历材料本身就包含主观性部分,在其他种类证据能够证明案件事实的情况下,鉴定意见并不具有不可替代性。鉴定意见并不当然具有较高证明力,不同的鉴定主体、选择不同的鉴定时机所作出的鉴定意见存在证明力上的差异性。人民法院通过开庭质证、交叉询问等方式能够对鉴定意见是否具有可采性作出判断。The appraisal opinion is the appraiser's speculation and judgment on the facts of a case by using scientific knowledge and methods.Its scientific character does not cover up its fuzzy defects.Moreover,the medical record material as the appraisal material itself contains the subjective part.In the case that other kinds of evidence can prove the facts of a case,the appraisal opinion is not irreplaceable.The appraisal opinions are not of course of high proving power.There are differences in proving power among different appraisal subjects and different appraisal opportunities.Only through examination and cross examination can we judge whether the appraisal opinion is admissible.

关 键 词：鉴定意见 医疗损害责任纠纷 科学性 可靠性标准 

分 类 号：D925.113[政治法律—诉讼法学]