康德是相容论者吗?  

Is Kant A Compatibilist?

作　　者：胡好 Hu Hao(Northwest Normal University,730070)

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学哲学系

出　　处：《哲学评论》2016年第2期54-65,共12页Wuda Philosophical Review

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“康德道义论重大理论与实践问题研究”(13JJD720007);博士后科学基金二等资助项目“康德的第二类比”(2015M572160)的资助。

摘　　要：第三个二律背反给康德相容论的判定造成了困境.正题不足以自行表明康德是相容论者,因为尽管有许多文本指出自由和自然因果性能够在同一个行动上共存,但二者还有许多冲突的地方.此外,康德说正题和反题都对,这进一步加大了判定的难度.本文在尽量弱化先验观念论的情况下,以自由和自然因果性在概念上是否矛盾为标准,依据二者在概念上的不矛盾,将康德判定为相容论者.但基于康德伦理学的目的,最终主张康德是相容论者,但是个独特的相容论者.There are dilemmas for judging whether Kant is a compatibilist or not due to the third antinomy.The thesis does not indicate that Kant is a compatibilist sufficiently,because despite there are many texts to show that freedom and natural causality can coexist on the same action,they are conflict.Besides,that Kant said both the thesis and the antithesis are right increases the difficulty for the judgment.In the case of trying to weaken the transcendental idealism,this paper puts a standard that whether freedom and natural causality are contradictory terms and judges that Kant is a compatibilist in accordance to no contradiction.Finally,based on the purpose of Kant’s ethics,this paper claims that Kant is a compatibilist,but a special compatibilist.

关 键 词：康德 相容论 自由 自然因果性 共存 矛盾 

分 类 号：B51[哲学宗教—外国哲学]