检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:庞海峰[1] 耿聪 庞舒月 PANG Hai-feng;GENG Cong;PANG Shu-yue(College of Finance,Harbin University of Commerce,Harbin 150028,China;Credit Department,Harbin Branch of Bank of Jinzhou,Harbin 150076,China)
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨商业大学金融学院,哈尔滨150028 [2]锦州银行哈尔滨分行信贷部,哈尔滨150076
出 处:《哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第2期43-53,共11页Journal of Harbin University of Commerce:Social Science Edition
摘 要:以2015—2018年深交所A股主板上市公司的面板数据为样本,运用面板随机效应模型,探究机构投资者实地调研对公司股价波动的影响。研究发现机构投资者实地调研的强弱程度影响公司股价的波动。具体来看,机构投资者的实地调研频次与股价波动呈现出正相关的关系,这表明实地调研可以发现更多的私有信息,提升了信息的使用效率。进一步研究显示,对于信息发布不全、行业竞争不激烈的公司来说,机构投资者实地调研的作用更大,这说明在信息披露较少的情况下,实地调研得到的信息发挥的作用更加显著。Using the balance panel data of the listed companies on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange’s A-share main board from 2015 to 2018,and using the panel random effects model,we explore the impact of institutional investors’field investigations on the company's stock price fluctuations.The results show that the strength of field investigations by institutional investors affects the fluctuation of the company’s stock price.Specifically,the frequency of on-site investigations by institutional investors is positively correlated with stock price fluctuations,which shows that on-site investigations can find more private information and increase the efficiency of information use.Further research shows that for companies with incomplete information release and low industry competition,institutional investor field research is more effective for companies with poor information disclosure content and low industry competition.This shows that in the case of less information disclosure,the information obtained from field research plays a more significant role.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.109.25