“以刑释罪”——一种新的刑法解释方法?  

“The Interpretation of a Crime by Punishment”:A New Criminal Interpretation Method?

作　　者：陈昊明 Chen Haoming

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院

出　　处：《政法论坛》2021年第3期152-163,共12页Tribune of Political Science and Law

基　　金：四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费(法学)(项目编号:2019fxzy-01);四川大学2020年度专职博士后基金(项目编号:skbsh2020-03)。

摘　　要："以刑释罪"是"以刑制罪"旗下众多观点中最为保守的,它区别于导入刑事政策的"结果主义"。从形式正当性而言,它虽然不单独构成与传统解释方法并列的新方法,但可以作为一种论证方法的辅助技巧帮助传统解释方法更好说理。从实质正当性而言,刑罚的两种正当化根据可以为其提供正当化根源,同时也并不违反罪刑法定原则的明确性要求,并且在承认刑法典罪刑结构不合理的情况下依然有其合理存在空间。"The interpretation of a crime by punishment" is the most conservative of many views under the "concept of the determination of a crime by the statutory penalty of crime". It is different from "consequentialism" that introduces criminal policy. From the perspective offormal legitimacy, although it does not constitute a new method alongside the traditional interpretation method, it can be used as a supplementary technique of argumentation to help the traditional interpretation method to be more reasonable. In terms of substantive legitimacy, the two justifications of punishment can provide the root cause of legitimacy, and at the same time do not violate the explicit requirements of the legal principle of criminal punishment, and still have their own reasonable space when the Criminal Law Code is not reasonable.

关 键 词：以刑释罪 结果主义 法律论证 罪行均衡 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]