对比两种一体化基台冠对种植体周边缘骨水平的影响  

Comparison of the influence of two different types of implant based integrated abutment crown on peri-implant marginal bone level

作　　者：张文雅 林天赐[1] 黄达鸿[1] 黎日照 汤秉欣 ZHANG Wen-ya;LIN Tian-ci;HUANG Da-hong;LI Ri-zhao;TANG Bing-xin(Foshan Stomatology Hospital,Foshan University,Foshan 528000,China)

机构地区：[1]佛山科学技术学院附属佛山市口腔医院,广东佛山528000

出　　处：《佛山科学技术学院学报（自然科学版）》2021年第3期19-21,共3页Journal of Foshan University(Natural Science Edition)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(51672276);佛山市医学类科技攻关资助项目(2016AB002011)。

摘　　要：目的评价钛金属底座个性化氧化锆一体化基台冠对种植体边缘骨水平的影响。方法40例符合后牙区单颗种植二期修复患者随机分为:对照组(A组)采用传统成品基台+氧化锆全冠一体化基台冠修复,实验组(B组)采用钛金属底座个性化氧化锆一体化基台冠修复。分别测量并记录修复后不同时期两组患者种植体周边缘骨水平变化量。结果两种一体化基台冠修复效果良好,修复3、6、12、24个月后A、B两组边缘骨丧失量平均值同期比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论钛金属底座个性化氧化锆一体化基台冠可用于后牙区单颗种植修复。Objective To evaluate the effect of individualized zirconia abutment crown with titanium base on the marginal bone level of implant.Methods A total of 40 patients were randomly divided into control group(group A)and experimental group(group B).The changes of peri implant bone level were measured and recorded in the two groups.Results The effect of two kinds of integrated abutment crowns was good.There was no significant difference in the average marginal bone loss between group A and group B after 3,6,12 and 24 months(P>0.05).Conclusion Individualized zirconia abutment crown with titanium base can be used for single implant restoration in posterior area.

关 键 词：基台一体化冠 种植体周边缘骨 钛金属底座 种植 

分 类 号：R78[医药卫生—口腔医学]