香港文化书写:从“混杂性”走向“认同性”——以也斯小说创作为例  

On Hong Kong culture:from hybridity to identity-Taking Yesi's novels as an example

作　　者：周礼红[1] Zhou Lihong(Shenzhen Academy of Social Sciences,Shenzhen,Guangdong,China 518060)

机构地区：[1]深圳市社会科学院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《深圳信息职业技术学院学报》2021年第2期14-21,共8页Journal of Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(项目编号:16BWW005)。

摘　　要：近50年来,香港文学关于香港文化的书写,经历了一个从“混杂性”向“认同性”的渐变过程。大约从1975年至1995年这一阶段可以看作香港文学回归过渡期,这一时期文学集中反映了香港文化的“混杂性”。也斯在前期作品中运用二元对立或多元化思维方式,表现出香港文化的“混杂性”:隔离、对立、迷惘与沟通、对话、探索。大约从1996年到2020年这一阶段可以看成香港文学的回归期,香港部分作家已明显反映出香港对中国文化的“认同性”,也斯在后期作品中对中国文化的认同性呈现出从含蓄表达到强烈展示的形态变化。也斯的小说创作交替运用现代主义和后现代主义手法去表现这一转变。这个转变的过程清楚体现出也斯用独特的文化立场来探寻香港的文化身份的努力。In the past 50 years,the discourse on Hong Kong culture in Hong Kong literature has experienced a gradual process from"hybridity"to"identity".The period from about 1975 to 1995 can be regarded as the transitional period of Hong Kong literature return.The literature of this period reflects the"hybridity"of Hong Kong culture.In his early works,Yesi used binary opposition or pluralistic thinking mode to show the"hybridity"of Hong Kong culture:isolation,opposition,confusion,communication,dialogue and exploration.The period from about 1996 to 2020 can be regarded as the return period of Hong Kong literature.Some Hong Kong writers have clearly reflected Hong Kong’s"identity"to Chinese culture.In Yesi’s later works,the identity of Chinese culture has shown a change of form from implicit expression to strong display.Yesi alternately uses modernism and postmodernism to express this change in his novels.The process of this transformation clearly reflects Yesi’s efforts to explore Hong Kong’s cultural identity from a unique cultural standpoint.

关 键 词：混杂性 认同性 现代主义 后现代主义 文化身份 

分 类 号：I207.42[文学—中国文学]