检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:索婷婷 冯会玲 刘磊[2] 孙佳忱 沈永青 SUO Ting-ting;FENG Hui-ling;LIU Lei(School of Nursing,Hebei University of Chinese Medicine,Shijiazhuang 050200,China)
机构地区:[1]河北中医学院护理学院,河北石家庄050200 [2]河北医科大学第四医院乳腺中心,河北石家庄050011
出 处:《医学与哲学》2021年第7期37-42,共6页Medicine and Philosophy
基 金:2018年教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(18YJAZH074);2020年河北中医学院研究生创新资助立项项目(XCXZZSS2020006)。
摘 要:为了解预立医疗照护计划(advance care planning,ACP)的研究热点及发展趋势,以ACP为主题检索Web of Science和PubMed数据库,从建库到2020年5月30日收录的文献,借助可视化工具对其被引作者、发文机构进行数据挖掘,并提取高频关键词进行双聚类分析。共纳入文献3552篇,被引最多的作者是Detering,被引频次为546。发文机构最多的是旧金山大学,发表文章122篇。共提取66个高频主题词,归纳出6个研究热点:生命支持治疗选择与偏好、ACP的法律问题、ACP的伦理问题、ACP沟通相关的问题、ACP的组织实施与相关人员心理状态研究和ACP的执行标准与方法策略。To understand the research hotspots and development trends in the field of advance care planning(ACP),the authors searched the literatures collected from Web of Science and PubMed databases from the establishment to May 30,2020 with the theme of"advance care planning".Using visualization tools,data mining was carried out for cited authors and publishing institutions,and high-frequency key words were extracted for dual-cluster analysis.A total of 3552 literatures were included,and the most cited author was Detering,with 546 literatures cited.The most published institution was the University of San Francisco,with 122 articles.A total of 66 high-frequency topics were extracted,and 6 research hotspots were summarized:life support treatment choice and preference,legal issues of ACP,ethical issues of ACP,communication-related issues of ACP,the relationship between the organization and implementation of ACP and the psychological state of relevant personnel,and ACP implementation standards,methods and strategies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222