检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲁绍臣[1,2] 王雨田 Lu Shaochen;Wang Yutian(Fudan University,Shanghai 200433)
机构地区:[1]复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心,上海200433 [2]复旦大学哲学学院,上海200433
出 处:《宁夏社会科学》2021年第3期19-25,共7页NingXia Social Sciences
摘 要:面对现代社会的危机和工具理性的批判困境,哈贝马斯提出了交往理性理论,试图在生活世界的背景下,构建基于交往理性的公共领域以实现统治阶层和公众之间的平等对话。托马斯·麦卡锡指出哈贝马斯的公共领域带有普遍主义色彩,忽略了主体的多元性和私人利益。哈贝马斯的交往理性面对着各种各样的困境,但同时时代的变迁可能带来新的机遇和挑战。立足于大数据时代背景,从交往理性的困境出发,分析大数据时代带来的交往资质的变化,并从精神机制维度为交往理性的可能辩护。Facing the crisis of modern society and the critical dilemma of instrumental rationality,Habermas proposed communicative rationality,trying to construct a public sphere based on communicative rationality in the context of the life world in order to achieve an equal dialogue between the ruling class and the public. Thomas McCarthy pointed out that Habermas’ public sphere theory is an universalism,ignoring the diversity of individuals’ interests. Habermas’ communicative rationality encounters various dilemmas,but changes in the society may bring new opportunities and challenges. Based on the era of big data,this article tries to analyze the dilemma of communicative rationality as well as the changes in communicative qualifications brought by the era of big data,and further defends the possibility of communicative rationality from the point of mental system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.132.213.245