“双一流”建设背景下交叉学科研究的非学术影响评价  

The Study of Non-academic Impact Evaluation of Interdisciplinary Research in the Context of“Double First-Class”Construction

作　　者：殷朝晖[1] 刘子涵 Yin Zhaohui;Liu Zihan(School of Education,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学教科院教育经济与管理研究所,武汉430072 [2]武汉大学教科院,武汉430072

出　　处：《教育发展研究》2021年第9期21-28,共8页Research in Educational Development

基　　金：国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“知识生产模式转型背景下一流学科建设路径研究(BIA180173)”的部分成果。

摘　　要：在"双一流"建设背景下,交叉学科研究因其不同学科交叉相融的研究范式,在促进知识生产和创新的同时产生了明显的非学术影响。在我国第五轮学科评估中,交叉学科研究的非学术影响评价还存在着对非学术影响的概念界定模糊、评价方式尚未完善、评价主体单一等问题。通过借鉴国外评价交叉学科研究之非学术影响的有益经验,我国应以设立专业的交叉学科研究评价委员会、分阶段评价交叉学科研究、多元评价主体联动评估等改革措施为着力点,构建科学的符合时代要求的交叉学科研究的非学术影响评价机制,以强化交叉学科研究成果的应用价值导向,推动"双一流"建设高校学科研究评价制度的改革与创新。In the context of"Double First-Class"construction,interdisciplinary research not only promotes knowledge production and innovation,but also has a predominant non-academic impact because of its integrative interdisciplinary research paradigm.However,in the 5 th China University Subject Rankings,there still exits some problems in the current non-academic impact evaluation of interdisciplinary research in China,such as the definition of non-academic impact is ambiguous;the evaluation method is not perfect yet and the evaluator is unitary.Through drawing on some innovative countries’beneficial thoughts and experience in evaluating the non-academic impact of interdisciplinary research,China should set up professional interdisciplinary research evaluation committee,evaluate the interdisciplinary research by stages and carry out the evaluation by multivariate evaluators jointly.These measures can help construct interdisciplinary research evaluation mechanism that is scientific and meets the requirements of the Times,which can strengthen the application-oriented value of the interdisciplinary research outcomes,promote the reform and innovation of"Double First-class"construction universities’disciplinary research evaluation system.

关 键 词：“双一流”建设 交叉学科研究 非学术影响 第五轮学科评估 评价网络 

分 类 号：G644[文化科学—高等教育学]