叠音词的性质及其判定标准再思考  

On the Nature and Determination Criterion of Reduplicated Words

作　　者：邱峰 QIU Feng(School of Humanities,Shangqiu Teachers College,Shangqiu,Henan 476000,China)

机构地区：[1]商丘师范学院人文学院,河南商丘476000

出　　处：《沧州师范学院学报》2021年第2期50-54,共5页Journal of Cangzhou Normal University

摘　　要：叠音词这个术语仅描写了叠音词的语音特征而未涉及其语义特征,导致学者们对叠音词的归属认识不统一。学者们给叠音词下定义时,有的仅限定其语音特征而失之片面;有的虽然限定了其语音特征和语义特征,但在判断单个音节是否是语素时却错误地将能否单独使用、能否单独表义、在词典中是否有单独解释等作为依据,有的甚至将字形是否表义作为依据。对叠音词定义的不全面以及对单个音节是否是语素的判定标准的不科学,导致学者们对具体实例性质的判定错误以及对叠音式拟音词性质的判定不科学。The term“reduplication”only describes the phonetic features of the words without involving their semantic features,which leads to the inconsistent understanding of the attribution of the words.When scholars define reduplicated words,some of them only consider their phonetic and semantic features,but when judging whether a single syllable is a morpheme,they mistakenly based on these factors:whether it can be used alone,whether it can express its meaning alone,whether there is a separate explanation in the dictionary,or even whether the glyph expresses its meaning.The incomprehensive definition of reduplicative words and the unscientific standard of judging whether a single syllable is a morpheme lead to the wrong judgment of the nature of concrete examples and unscientific judgment of the nature of reduplicative onomatopoeia.

关 键 词：叠音词 语素 联绵词 合成词 

分 类 号：H136.7[语言文字—汉语]