检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭晓会[1] 冯志杰[2] GUO Xiaohui;FENG Zhijie(Department of Gastroenterology,Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University,Hebei Province,Handan 056000,China)
机构地区:[1]河北工程大学附属医院消化内科,河北省邯郸市056000 [2]河北医科大学第二医院,石家庄市050000
出 处:《临床合理用药杂志》2021年第14期24-26,29,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
摘 要:目的分析肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张内镜治疗前后血浆尾加压素Ⅱ(UⅡ)、内皮素(ET)、血管活性肠肽(VIP)的变化及临床意义。方法收集2017年6月-2019年11月河北工程大学附属医院消化内科病房收治的肝硬化门脉高压患者50例,根据肝功能分级标准,A级27例,B级18例,C级5例。按照不同内镜治疗方法分为套扎组(20例)、硬化组(21例)及联合治疗组(9例)。于内镜治疗前、治疗后1 d、7 d测定各组患者血浆UⅡ、ET和VIP水平,分析内镜治疗前后血浆UⅡ、ET和VIP水平的变化。结果内镜治疗前,Child-pugh A、B、C级患者血浆UⅡ、ET、VIP水平比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);与治疗前比较,治疗后1 d、7 d不同Child-pugh分级患者血浆UⅡ、VIP水平均无变化(P>0.05);Child-pugh A、B级患者ET治疗后1 d、7 d与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Child-pugh C级患者ET治疗后1 d与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后7 d与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。套扎组、硬化组、联合治疗组治疗前后血浆UⅡ、ET、VIP水平均无变化(P>0.05)。结论食管胃静脉曲张不同内镜治疗方法对血浆UⅡ、ET、VIP水平无明显影响,内镜治疗前后对门静脉血流动力学无明显影响。Objective To analyze the changes and clinical significance of plasma urotensin(UⅡ),endothelin(ET and vasoactive intestinal peptide(VIP)before and after endoscopic treatment of cirrhotic esophagus and gastric varices.Methods 50 cases of cirrhotic portal hypertension admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology,Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University from June 2017 to November 2019 were collected.According to the liver function grading standard,there were 27 cases of grade A,18 cases of grade B and 5 cases of grade C.According to different endoscopic treatment methods,the patients were divided into ligation group(20 cases),sclerotherapy group(21 cases)and combination therapy group(9 cases).In endoscopy before and after treatment 1 d,7 d to,determine each group patients plasma UⅡET and VIP level,Analysis of endoscopic before and after treatment plasma UⅡET and VIP level changes.Results Child-pugh before endoscopic treatment for patients with grade A,B,C plasma UⅡ,ET and VIP level comparative differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);Compared with before treatment,after treatment 1 d,7 d different Child-pugh,classifying patients plasma UⅡ,VIP levels had no significant change(P>0.05);Child-pugh,A and B ET level in patients with 1 d,7 d after treatment were no statistically significant difference compared with before treatment(P>0.05);Child-pugh C ET level after treatment in patients with 1 d was no statistically significant difference compared with before treatment(P>0.05),7 d after treatment compared with before treatment difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Ligation group,hardening,combined treatment group before and after treatment,had no significant change in the level of plasma UⅡ,ET,VIP(P>0.05).Conclusion Different endoscopic treatments for esophageal and gastric varices have no significant effect on plasma UⅡ,ET,VIP levels,and no significant effect on portal hemodynamics before and after endoscopic treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145