检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李佳威 Li Jiawei(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出 处:《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2021年第3期77-83,共7页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
摘 要:长期以来,被害人参与问题都是刑事诉讼关注的重点问题。《刑事诉讼法》于2012年确立的刑事和解制度,使被害人参与刑事诉讼的空间得到了极大扩张。在刑事和解制度中,被害人的参与程度极高,在整个制度体系中发挥着至关重要的作用。自从认罪认罚从宽制度进入刑事诉讼的视野,其与刑事和解制度的衔接问题就成为学界探讨的重点。从被害人的角度来看,由于两种制度在价值取向和制度设计上存在差异,被害人参与在发挥作用、程序开启以及参与程度三个方面同样存在不同。因此,从被害人参与的角度实现认罪认罚从宽制度与刑事和解制度的衔接,就必须对不同制度中的被害人参与加以调整和明确。For a long time,the issue of victim’s participation has been the focus of criminal litigation.The criminal reconciliation system established by the Criminal Procedure Law in 2012 has greatly expanded the space for victims to participate in criminal litigation.In the criminal reconciliation system,the victim’s participation is extremely high,which plays a vital role in the entire system.Since the leniency system of pleading guilty and punishment entered the vision of criminal litigation,its connection with the criminal reconciliation system has become the focus of academic discussion.From the perspective of the victim,due to the differences in the value orientation and system design of the two systems,there are also differences in the playing of the role,the opening of the procedure and the degree of the participation for the victim’s participation.Therefore,to realize the connection between the leniency system of pleading guilty and punishment and the criminal reconciliation system from the perspective of victim’s participation,it is necessary to adjust and clarify the victim’s participation in different systems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170