协调资本主义的知识经济转型路径研究——以瑞典和德国为例  

The Path of Knowledge Economy Transformation in Coordinated Capitalism:Case Studies of Sweden and Germany

作　　者：蒋尊泽 JIANG Zunze

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学国际关系学院

出　　处：《欧洲研究》2021年第2期110-134,I0004,I0005,共27页Chinese Journal of European Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目“逆全球化背景下‘国家转型论’反思与国家类型重构研究”(项目批准号:19XGJ022)的阶段性成果之一。

摘　　要：多样性的资本主义模式具有多样性的政治基础,约束着知识经济转型的路径选择。瑞典和德国两国知识经济转型都体现出对协调资本主义模式的延续,没有复制美国自由资本主义的“硅谷模式”。与此同时,两国的转型路径也因政治联盟的不同呈现出显著的差异。瑞典通过国家、雇主和工会三方政治联盟协商,达成支持信息通信技术转型的共识,实现了激进的知识经济产业结构升级。德国的知识经济转型则因制造业联盟过于强大而呈现出保守性,按照行业组织的劳资双方都缺乏进军新产业的意愿,因此,只能在既有高端制造业基础上添加数字化成分。The diversified capitalism models have distinctive political structures,which restricts the path choice of knowledge economy transformation.As far as the transformation of knowledge economy is concerned,neither Sweden nor Germany copies the Silicon Valley model of American liberal capitalism.The transition trajectories of Sweden and Germany have witnessed the continuity of coordinated capitalism,which at the same time have shown significant differences due to different political coalitions.Sweden has achieved a radical industrial structure upgrading of its information and communication technology.The key to Sweden's success is the establishment of a tripartite political coalition composed of the government,employers and trade unions.The transformation of knowledge economy in Germany is comparatively conservative due to the powerful cross-class coalitions in specific industries,and both employers and employees lack the willingness to enter new industries.Therefore,the digital upgrade in Germany is only limited to defending the existing high-quality manufacturing advantages.

关 键 词：知识经济 协调资本主义 政治联盟 制度互补性 制度变革 

分 类 号：F151.6[经济管理—世界经济] F153.2