手助腹腔镜在胃癌根治术中的应用  被引量:6

The application of hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:郭爱军[1] 鲁明典[1] 周波[1] GUO Ai-jun;LU Ming-dian;ZHOU Bo(Department of General Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei,Anhui 230032,China)

机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学第一附属医院普外科,安徽合肥230032

出  处:《中华全科医学》2021年第7期1099-1102,共4页Chinese Journal of General Practice

基  金:安徽省自然科学基金青年基金(1708085QH199)。

摘  要:目的探讨在胃癌手术中手助腹腔镜技术的临床应用。方法回顾性分析2018年1月—2020年12月期间在安徽医科大学第一附属医院胃肠外科治疗的60例胃癌患者的临床资料,其中20例行手助腹腔镜手术,20例行传统开腹手术,其余20例行腹腔镜辅助手术,分析比较3组之间手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、术后排气时间、术后首次下床活动时间、住院时间、术中清扫淋巴结数目等指标的差异。结果60例手术均顺利完成。分析发现,手助腹腔镜组与腹腔镜辅助组手术时间较开腹组较长[(239.7±22.2)min、(251.9±33.2)min、(184.1±37.2)min,F=26.309,P<0.001],但手助腹腔镜组与辅助腹腔镜组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。手助腹腔镜组与腹腔镜辅助组较开腹组术中出血量少(F=68.984,P<0.001),且手助腹腔镜组较辅助腹腔镜组明显减少(P<0.05)。手助腹腔镜组与腹腔镜辅助组较开腹组术中切口较小(F=675.937,P<0.001),但手助腹腔镜组与腹腔镜辅助组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。手助腹腔镜组和腹腔镜辅助组术后排气时间、住院时间以及首次下床活动时间较开腹组均显著降低(均P<0.001),但2组比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。3组患者淋巴结清扫数量差异无统计学意义(F=0.582,P=0.562)。结论手助腹腔镜技术集中了开放和腔镜的优势,对助手要求低,节约人力,患者创伤小、出血少、用时短、术后康复快、并发症少,是一种安全可行的术式。Objective To explore the clinical application of hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy(HALG)for the treatment of gastric cancer.Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 60 patients with gastric cancer who were treated in the Department of Gastroenterology,First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2018 to December 2020,among which 20 patients underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery,20 underwent traditional open surgery,and 20 underwent laparoscopic assisted surgery.The differences in operative time,blood loss,incision length,postoperative discharge time,duration of first time to get out of bed after surgery,length of hospital stay,number of dissected lymph nodes and other indicators among the three groups were analyzed.Results All of the 60 operations were completed successfully.Results of the three groups showed that the operation time of the hand-assisted laparoscopic group and the laparoscopic assisted group were significantly longer than that of the traditional group[(239.7±22.2)min,(251.9±33.2)min,(184.1±37.2)min,F=26.309,P<0.001],but there was no significant difference in the operation time between the hand-assisted laparoscopic group and laparoscopic assisted group(P>0.05).The blood loss of the hand-assisted laparoscopic group and the laparoscopic assisted group were significantly less than that of the traditional group(F=68.984,P<0.001),and the blood loss of the hand-assisted laparoscopic group was shorter than that of the laparoscopic assisted group(P<0.05).The incision length of the hand-assisted laparoscopic group and the laparoscopic assisted group were significantly smaller than that of the traditional group(F=675.937,P<0.001),but there was no significant difference between the hand-assisted laparoscopic group and the laparoscopic assisted group(P>0.05).Postoperative exhaust time,length of hospital stay and duration of first time to get out of bed after surgery of the hand-assisted laparoscopic group and the laparoscopic assisted group longe

关 键 词:胃癌 手助腹腔镜技术 并发症 

分 类 号:R735.2[医药卫生—肿瘤]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象