检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕黎江 吴剑 Lv Lijiang;Wu Jian(Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058)
机构地区:[1]浙江大学公共卫生学院,杭州310058 [2]浙江大学人事处,杭州310058
出 处:《浙江社会科学》2021年第7期144-149,F0003,共7页Zhejiang Social Sciences
摘 要:人才队伍是“双一流”建设的关键,而科学的评价体系对于激励教师从事创造性学术活动至关重要。以质量和贡献为导向,是世界一流大学教师评价的基本趋势,也是落实中央《深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案》的关键指向。二十多年来,国内高校教师评价历经了量化业绩、分类考核、注重质量到建立多元化评价体系的阶段性演进。本文结合我国高水平大学的改革实践,探讨高校教师评价改革的基本趋势和实施重点,并提出进一步改进思路。The development of faculty team is the key to the“double first-class”construction,and a scientific evaluation system is vital to motivate faculty to engage in creative academic activities.Guided by quality and contribution is the basic trend of faculty evaluation in world-class universities and domestic top universities.And it is also an important subject for the implementation of the“Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Educational Evaluation in the New Era”.With the development of over 20 years,the evaluation of faculty in domestic universities has gone through a gradual evolution from quantified performance,classified assessment,focusing on quality to the establishment of a diverse evaluation system,which has strongly supported the construction of a world-class universities.Combined with domestic top universities’reform practice,this article explores the basic trends and implementation priorities of university faculty evaluation reforms,and proposes improvement ideas.
分 类 号:G645.1[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4