为事实申言  

To Claim for the Facts

作　　者：李主斌[1,2] LI Zhu-bin(School of Marxism,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200240,China;Center for Logic and Intelligence Research,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学马克思主义学院,上海200240 [2]西南大学逻辑与智能研究中心,重庆400715

出　　处：《河北学刊》2021年第4期66-75,共10页Hebei Academic Journal

基　　金：2020年度国家社会科学基金项目“当代分析形而上学下的事实世界研究”(20BZX031);2014年度重庆市人文社会科学重点研究基地重点项目“事实概念的逻辑——语义刻画研究”(14SKB046)。

摘　　要：真理符合论在近百年的主流刻画中都求诸事实。最近,陈波批评事实符合论的论文引起了一场争论。根据陈波的观点,基于事实无法个体化以及事实与命题的关系无法厘清这两个理由,事实符合论应该被抛弃。然而,一方面,事实符合论的出场有其深刻的形而上学动机;另一方面,陈波批评事实的两个理由要么基于有待辩护的世界观,要么赋予了语言使用过多的本体论意义,因而都不是判决性的。In the mainstream depiction of the past hundred years,the theory of fact correspondence seeks all facts.Recently,Chen Bo’s criticism of the theory of fact correspondence has caused a controversy.According to Chen Bo,the theory of fact correspondence should be abandoned for the two reasons that facts cannot be individualized and the relationship between facts and propositions cannot be clarified.However,on the one hand,the appearance of the theory of fact correspondence has its profound metaphysical motivation;on the other hand,Chen Bo’s two reasons are either based on the world outlook to be defended or endow too much ontological meaning to language use,so they are not judgmental.

关 键 词：事实 使真者 个体化条件 世界 命题 

分 类 号：B81-06[哲学宗教—逻辑学]