基于SPEC CPU2017的CPU性能对比分析  

A Comparative Analysis of CPU Performance Based on SPEC CPU2017

作　　者：赵龙飞 李晓婷 丁振兰 姚日煌[1,2] ZHAO Longfei;LI Xiaoting;DING Zhenlan;YAO Rihuang(CEPREI,Guangzhou 511370,China;Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Power System Network Security,Guangzhou 510670,China;Pengcheng Laboratory,Shenzhen 518055,China)

机构地区：[1]工业和信息化部电子第五研究所,广东广州511370 [2]广东省电力系统网络安全企业重点实验室,广东广州510670 [3]鹏城实验室,广东深圳518055

出　　处：《电子产品可靠性与环境试验》2021年第S01期55-59,共5页Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing

摘　　要：通过对国产CPU进行了研究,介绍了目前国产CPU的发展情况。选取了基于ARM架构的某款国产CPU Hi1616,使用国际权威的CPU性能测试工具SPEC CPU2017对其和基于X86架构的Intel E5-2650v4做了比较,分别从不同线程数下的计算速度性能和不同任务拷贝数下的吞吐量性能两个方面比较了两款CPU的性能,最后,验证了编译器GCC版本对测试结果的影响。结果显示,在多任务高并发计算场景下,Hi1616更具有性能优势,Intel E5-2609v4能够较好地满足单线程科学计算场景的要求。Through the research on domestic CPU,the current development of domestic CPU is introduced.A domestic CPU Hi1616 based on ARM architecture is selected and compared with Intel E5-2650 v4 based on X86 architecture by using the internationally authoritative CPU performance testing tool of SPEC CPU 2017.The performance of the two CPUs is compared from the calculation speed performance under different thread numbers and the throughput performance under different task copy numbers.Finally,the effect of the compiler GCC version on the test results is verified.The results show that Hi1616 has more performance advantages in multi-task and high-concurrency computing scenarios,and Intel E5-2609 v4 can better meet the requirements of singe-threaded scientific computing scenarios.

关 键 词：ARM 中央处理器 SPEC CPU2017 性能测试 

分 类 号：TP332[自动化与计算机技术—计算机系统结构]