“一M又一M”与“一M一M”构式的语用语义差异考察  

An Investigation of the Pragmatic and Semantic Differences between“一M又一M”and“一M一M”Construction

作　　者：王钰凤 Wang Yufeng(College of Arts,Huaibei Normal University,Huaibei 235000,China)

机构地区：[1]淮北师范大学文学院,安徽淮北235000

出　　处：《黄山学院学报》2021年第2期79-82,共4页Journal of Huangshan University

基　　金：国家社科基金重大招标项目(17ZDA307)。

摘　　要：根据Goldberg的构式理论,"一M又一M"与"一M一M"可鉴定为构式。两者在语义上的差别主要是前者表现为强离散性和强次序性,后者表现为弱离散性和弱次序性;在引申义上前者可引申为"更费力"之意,而后者引申为"费力"之意。语用差别体现为舒缓与紧张、正式与非正式的差别。造成这种差别的原因与"又"字的增值语义、象似性和主观性有关。According to Goldberg’s construction theory,"一M又一M"and"一M 一M"can be identified as constructions( M means noun quantifier or verb quantifier). The main difference in semantics between the two is: the former shows strong dispersion and strong sequentiality while the latter shows weak dispersion and sequentiality. The former can be extended to mean "more laborious" while the latter means"laborious"with extension. The pragmatic difference is reflected by relaxation and tension as well as formality and informality. The reason for these differences is related to the value-added semantics, iconicity and subjectivity of"又".

关 键 词：构式 一M又一M 一M一M 主观性 离散性 次序性 

分 类 号：H109.4[语言文字—汉语]