高校对分课堂教学刍议--基于批判性思维视角  

Discussion of PAD Teaching Mode in Higher Education--Based on Critical Thinking

作　　者：何世明 贺未英 HE Shi-ming;HE Wei-ying(Business School,Shaoguan University,Shaoguan 512005,Guangdong,China)

机构地区：[1]韶关学院商学院 [2]韶关学院人事处,广东韶关512005

出　　处：《韶关学院学报》2021年第5期47-52,共6页Journal of Shaoguan University

基　　金：广东省教育厅教改项目“基于产教融合的国际经济与贸易专业协同人才培养模式研究——以韶关学院为例”(2020-526);韶关学院校级重点教改项目“地方高校基于产教融合的国际经济与贸易专业协同人才培养模式与实践”(SYJY20181906)。

摘　　要：对分课堂被认为是一种具有中国原创性的课堂教学模式,在教育界掀起了一股研究热潮。在回顾现有文献的基础上,比较分析对分课堂与国外高等教育发达国家的高校课堂教学模式,结果发现:对分课堂与国外高校主要课堂教学模式高度相似,且现阶段还不具备普遍推广价值;应根据不同学科特点理性选择,不可盲目使用和强制推行。对分课堂要想取得较好的教学效果,需要转变观念、改革现有的教学管理体制机制和评价体系、改善教学条件、增加课程教学时数。The PAD,considered as a China’s originally innovative teaching mode is bring about a great academic upsurge.Based on literature review,comparing PAD and the main teaching mode of the advanced countries in higher education,it comes to an end that the PAD is highly analogous to the teaching mode of those countries,and is unworthy to be widespread at the present stage.The PAD should be rationally employed according to the characters of different subjects,ought not to use arbitrarily and perform forcedly.It is necessary for PAD to have new ideas,innovative supervision of teaching activities,suitable equipment and more class hours to get ideal results.

关 键 词：高等教育 对分课堂 教学模式 批判性思维 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]