检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘广宇[1] 吴焕焕[1] 白人驹[1] LIU Guang-yu;WU Huan-huan;BAI Ren-ju(Department of Radiology,General Hospital,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300052,China)
机构地区:[1]天津医科大学总医院医学影像科,天津300052
出 处:《天津医科大学学报》2021年第4期405-408,共4页Journal of Tianjin Medical University
摘 要:目的:评估MRI平扫量化参数在肾脏嗜酸细胞瘤与嫌色细胞癌鉴别诊断中的价值。方法:本研究回顾性分析42例经病理证实患者的MRI平扫数据,其中嗜酸细胞瘤18例,嫌色细胞癌24例。由两名医生采用盲法测量肿瘤实性成分的T1WI及T2WI标准化信号值(SSI)、表观弥散系数(ADC)。应用组内相关系数(ICC)评估测量的可靠性,采用独立样本t检验分析各参数间差异的统计学意义,受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线分析来衡量各参数的诊断效能。结果:两名医师的测量具有极高的可靠性(ICC:0.805~0.911)。嫌色细胞癌的平均ADC值低于嗜酸细胞瘤[(1.07±0.20)×10^(-3) mm^(2)/s vs.(1.48±0.17)×10^(-3) mm^(2)/s;P<0.001],T2WI-SSI高于嗜酸细胞瘤[(1.72±0.22)vs.(1.32±0.26);P<0.001],T1WI-SSI在两组间差异无显著意义[(0.89±0.15)vs.(0.80±0.12);P=0.35]。ROC分析显示ADC值的曲线下面积(AUC)高于T2WI-SSI(0.942 vs.0.859)。结论:ADC值与T2WI标准化信号强度对于鉴别肾嗜酸细胞瘤和嫌色细胞癌均有帮助,但ADC值具有更高的诊断价值。Objective:To evaluate the value of quantitative parameters of MRI plain scan sequence on distinguishing renal oncocytoma from chromophobe cell carcinoma.Methods:The MRI plain scan imaging of 42 patients were retrospectively evaluated.All cases were pathologically diagnosed after operation,including 18 renal oncocytoma and 24 chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.Two radiologists blindly measured the standardized signal intensity(SSI)of T1WI and T2WI,apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)values of the solid components in the tumor.The intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)was calculated to analyze the reliability of the measurements.The independent sample t-test was used to analyze the statistical significance of the differences between the parameters,and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each parameter.Results:The ICC value of the two radiologists ranged from 0.805 to 0.911,indicating highly reliable measurement.The mean ADC value of chromophobe cell carcinoma was lower than that of renal oncocytoma[(1.07±0.20)×10^(-3) mm^(2)/s vs.(1.48±0.17)×10^(-3) mm^(2)/s;P<0.001],and the mean T2WI-SSI was higher than that of renal oncocytoma[(1.72±0.22)vs.(1.32±0.26),P<0.001],while there was no significant difference in T1WI-SSI between renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma[(0.89±0.15)vs.(0.80±0.12);P=0.35].ROC analysis showed that the area under curve(AUC)of ADC value were higher than that of T2WI-SSI(0.942 vs.0.859).Conclusion:Both ADC value and T2WI-SSI are helpful for differentiating renal oncocytoma from chromophobe renal cell carcinoma,with ADC showing higher diagnostic value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3