民事异步审理的性质及其正当性证成  

The Nature of Asynchronous Civil Trial and Its Justification

作　　者：王庆宇[1] WANG Qing-yu(School of Law,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《贵州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第4期151-160,共10页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：民事异步审理是传统线下审理和在线同步审理之外的一种独立的案件审理方式。其作为一种独立的案件审理方式的正当性论证需要从多重视角来进行。在对传统的突破方面,伴随着科技的发展,民事异步审理将突破传统理论和规范,进而获得其自身的历史正当性;在程序价值方面,民事异步审理对公正的保障为其提供了正当性依据;在程序选择权方面,对程序选择权的保障增加了其正当性;在获取信息的保障方面,民事异步审理中信息的获取并不会与同步审理产生本质差别。民事异步审理向同步审理的转换和更多技术应用的空间也都同样提供了民事异步审理作为一种独立审理方式的正当性依据,同时也为民事异步审理自身的正当性提供了依据。The nature of civil asynchronous trial is an independent trial mode in addition to traditional present trial and online synchronous trial.Its justification needs to be conducted from multiple perspectives.In terms of breakthroughs in tradition,with the development of technology,asynchronous civil trial will break through traditional theories and norms,and gain its own justification in the historical period;In terms of procedural value,the guarantee of fairness in civil asynchronous trials provides the justification;in terms of the right of procedural options,the protection of the right of procedural options increases its justification;in terms of the guarantee of obtaining information,the obtained information will not be essentially different from the synchronous trial;what’s more,the transform to synchronous trial,the space for more technical applications also provide justification for the asynchronous civil trial as an independent trial mode.At the same time,it also provides its own justification.

关 键 词：民事异步审理 程序价值 程序选择权 信息获取 审理方式转换 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]