劳动争议仲裁裁决不予执行司法审查程序存废之检讨  

A Reflection on the Existence or Abolition of Judicial Review Procedure of Non-enforcement of Labor Dispute Arbitration Awards

作　　者：冯成丰 FENG Chengfeng(School of Economics and Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《中国劳动关系学院学报》2021年第4期59-67,共9页Journal of China University of Labor Relations

摘　　要：劳动争议仲裁属于社会主义和谐劳动关系话语体系下的法定仲裁,与以民间合意自治为基础的商事仲裁无制度生成上的关联性。研究认为:劳动争议仲裁裁决不予执行是基于协议仲裁的一裁终局属性所生成的救济途径,不应适用于作为诉讼前置程序的劳动争议仲裁,并易造成重复救济,对效率和保护弱势劳动者的价值追求目标造成损害;相关司法解释为追求社会效果创设了对劳动争议仲裁裁决不予执行的监督程序,混淆了法定仲裁和协议仲裁的界限,扩大了民事诉讼法第237条的适用范围,易带来法律冲突和适用困境。研究建议,对劳动争议仲裁裁决进行司法审查,需尊重其公法属性,严格依据法律规定,按照法律赋予的救济手段作出裁判。Labor dispute arbitration belongs to statutory arbitration under the socialist harmonious labor relations discourse system,whilst it has no institutional relevance to commercial arbitration based on civil consensus and autonomy.The research believes that the non-enforcement of labor dispute arbitration award is a relief method based on the final nature of the agreement arbitration.It should not be applied to labor dispute arbitration as a pre-litigation procedure,and it is easy to cause repeated relief,a disadvantage for efficiency and protection.The pursuit of the value of the laborer causes loss.The relevant judicial interpretation creates a supervision procedure for the non-implementation of labor dispute arbitration award for the pursuit of social effects,which confuses the boundaries between statutory arbitration and agreement arbitration,and expands the application of Article 237 of the Civil Procedure Law Scope.Thus,it is easy to bring about legal conflicts and application dilemma.The research insists that judicial review of labor dispute arbitration awards must respect their public law attributes,strictly follow the law’s express provisions,and make judgments in accordance with the remedies granted by law.

关 键 词：劳动争议仲裁 协议仲裁 不予执行 一裁终局 公法行为 

分 类 号：DF47[政治法律—民商法学]