留守儿童的反社会行为:研究进展与展望  

Anti-Social Behavior of Left-Behind Children: Research Progress and Prospect

作　　者：袁小平[1] 彭萍 YUAN Xiaoping;PENG Ping

机构地区：[1]南昌大学公共管理学院,南昌330031 [2]宜春职业技术学院护理系,宜春336000

出　　处：《公安学研究》2021年第3期91-108,124,共19页Journal of Public Security Science

基　　金：江西省教育科学规划课题“留守儿童反社会行为的现状、生成与预防研究”(20YB011)。

摘　　要：通过对近十几年来有关留守儿童反社会行为的文献进行系统回顾发现,现有研究对留守儿童反社会行为的解释主要有三大范式:个体范式、社会范式、互动范式。个体范式呈现内驱力归因,即将留守儿童反社会行为的生成归因为个体认知、人格、情绪等维度,且认为留守儿童更多表现为情绪性的反社会行为;社会范式则呈现外驱力归因,即将留守儿童反社会行为的生成归因为社会支持、社会控制、家庭结构等维度,且认为留守儿童更多表现为结构性的反社会行为;互动范式呈现内外驱力双归因,即将留守儿童反社会行为的生成归因为亲子关系、同伴邻里关系、师生关系等互动维度,且认为留守儿童更多表现为适应性的反社会行为。应当在总结既有研究成果的基础上,整合力量加大对留守儿童反社会行为的系统研究。一方面要加强对留守儿童个体能动性因素及其非正式支持系统的关注;另一方面要加强对留守儿童反社会行为的预防、治理研究,以期促进农村留守儿童的全面发展。Increasing extreme cases of left-behind children’s anti-social behavior in rural areas have attracted wide attention.Based on a literature review on left-behind children’s anti-social behavior in recent decades,there are three interpretive paradigms-individual paradigm,social paradigm,and interactive paradigm.The individual paradigm focuses on internal drive attribution,including individual cognition,personality and emotion,and proves that left-behind children are more likely to show emotional anti-social behavior.The social paradigm emphasizes external-drive attribution,such as social support,social control and family structure,and explains that they tend to show structural antisocial behaviors.The interaction paradigm centers around dual driving attribution such as parent-child relationship,peer neighborhood relationship and teacher-student relationship,and highlights that they may show adaptive anti-social behaviors.The paper argues that systematic research should focus more on this group’s individual initiative factors and informal support system,and the prevention and treatment of their anti-social behavior.

关 键 词：留守儿童 反社会行为 个体范式 社会范式 互动范式 

分 类 号：C913.5[经济管理]