检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张景华[1] 刘畅 Zhang Jinghua;Liu Chang
机构地区:[1]国家税务总局党校科研所 [2]天津财经大学财税与公共管理学院
出 处:《财经科学》2021年第6期81-91,共11页Finance & Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“国家治理与现代税收制度构建研究”(16CJL003);天津市高校“青年后备人才支持计划”。
摘 要:企业的创新发展需要良好的制度环境。本文探讨政府简政放权相关制度要素对微观企业创新研发的引致效应。选取2008—2016年度A股上市公司作为研究样本,并结合《中国分省企业经营环境指数报告》中的相关指标进行宏观数据与微观数据匹配,研究发现:(1)政府放权程度愈高,对企业创新投入与研发产出的激励效应愈为显著,经过一系列稳健性检验后,该结论依然可靠;(2)放权越彻底,企业制度性交易成本越低,特别是对于高财务杠杆企业和大规模企业,对制度环境的预期越加乐观,制度环境对创新活动的激励效应愈加显著。为进一步把脉行政体制改革、引导微观主体创新,应进一步完善政府治理、激发企业创新活力。The innovation and development of enterprises need a good institutional environment.Based on the A-share listed companies in 2008-2016,combined with“Report on the Operating Environment Index of Chinese Provincial Enterprises”,this paper explores the impact of the relevant institutional factors of streamlining administration on microenterprises’s innovative R&D under the current institutional environment in China.The results show that:(1)The less the administrative intervention,the more significant the incentive effect on enterprises’R&D input and output.After a series of robustness tests,the conclusion is still robust.(2)The more thorough decentralization,the more optimistic the high financial leverage enterprises and large-scale enterprises are about the institutional environment,the more obvious the incentive effect of institutional environment on Innovation activities.This paper provides the micro-level experience support for further reform of administrative system and guidance of micro-subjects to improve the level of innovation quality,and provides useful reference for more targeted improvement of government governance and stimulation of enterprise innovation vitality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222