检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘宇 LIU Yu
机构地区:[1]中国矿业大学(北京)文法学院
出 处:《北方法学》2021年第4期148-160,共13页Northern Legal Science
摘 要:准确高效的类案判断程序是进行"类案类判"的必要前提和重要保障,有助于保证司法公正和避免裁判的差异性。传统的类案判断程序在疑难案件处理上需要借助经验或价值选择,难以摆脱任意性的困境。间接后果主义的类案判断程序以判决指引的行为作为比较点,通过影响行为后果评价的因素确定案件的相似性程度,最终依照关键事实进行类案判断。如此,有助于缓解疑难案件的任意性特征,从而更好实现类案类判的司法价值。Accurate and efficient judgment procedure for similar cases is the necessary precondition and important guarantee for"similar cases similar trial",and it helps to ensure judicial fairness and avoid discrepancies in judgment.The traditional judgment procedure for similar cases still needs to rely on experience or value choice in the handling of difficult cases,and it is difficult to get rid of the dilemma of"arbitrariness".The"indirect consequentialism"judgement procedure for similar cases takes"the conduct guided by the judgement"as the point of comparison and determines the degree of similarity of cases through"the factors affecting the evaluation of the consequences of the conduct".Ultimately,judging a similar case according to the key facts will help alleviate the"arbitrariness"characteristic of difficult cases,thus better realize the judicial value of"similar cases similar trial".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.73.229