检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张益飞[1] 李月玥 杨彦松 龚海鹏 郑桂华[1] 葛亚琼 ZHANG Yi-fei;LI Yue-yue;YANG Yan-song;GONG Hai-peng;ZHENG Gui-hua;GE Ya-qiong(Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University,Nantong Jiangsu 226000,China;GE Healthcare,Shanghai 210000,China)
机构地区:[1]南通市肿瘤医院,江苏南通226000 [2]GE Healthcare,上海210000
出 处:《中国临床医学影像杂志》2021年第7期500-505,共6页Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
基 金:南通市卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题专项面上项目(MA2020007);南通大学临床研究专项青年项目(2019LQ014)。
摘 要:目的:探讨高分辨率MR影像组学列线图预测直肠癌脉管侵袭(LVI)的价值。方法:回顾性入组本院2016年12月—2019年12月的直肠癌患者140例,选取病灶最大截面的斜轴位勾画病灶,提取影像组学特征。采用最大相关最小冗余对影像组学特征进行初步筛选,然后进行LASSO回归分析降维,计算影像组学标签。单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析临床特征、MR影像表现、影像组学标签与LVI的关系并构建预测LVI的模型。结果:LVI发生率约20.7%(29/140),LVI组和无LVI组两组间年龄((61.7±11.7)vs(65.8±9.6),P=0.049)、组织学分级(9/83/19 vs 8/19/2,P=0.011)、磁共振肿瘤T分期(79/32 vs 19/19,P<0.001)、磁共振肿瘤N分期(72/39 vs 11/18,P=0.011)、环周切缘状态(27/84 vs 14/15,P=0.020)、壁外血管侵犯状态(21/90 vs16/13,P<0.001)有统计学差异,余指标无统计学差异。最终预测LVI的列线图包括年龄、组织学分级、磁共振肿瘤T分期、影像组学标签,训练集曲线下面积(AUC)=0.84(95%CI:0.73~0.94),验证集AUC=0.81(95%CI:0.62~1.00)。结论:基于高分辨率MR影像组学列线图能较好的预测直肠癌LVI。Objective:To establish and verify a radiomic nomogram for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer.Methods:One hundred and forty rectal cancer patients in our hospital from December 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled.The lesions were delineated on high-resolution oblique axial T2 WI and radiomic features were extracted.Firstly,the radiomic features were initially screened by maximum correlation and minimum redundancy,then LASSO regression analysis was performed to screen the features again and radiomic signature was calculated.Univariate analysis was conducted on the radiomic features,clinical risk factors and MRI findings.Multivariate logistic analysis was carried out to in-vestigate the final feature subset and thus the predicting model was established.Results:LVI was present in 20.7%(29/140)of rectal cancer patients.There were statistically significant differences in age(61.7±11.7 vs 65.8±9.6,P=0.049),histological grade(9/83/19 vs 8/19/2,P=0.011),MRI reported T stage(79/32 vs 19/19,P<0.001),MRI reported N stage(72/39 vs 11/18,P=0.011),circumferential resection margin status(27/84 vs 14/15,P=0.020)and extramural vascular invasion(21/90 vs 16/13,P<0.001)between the LVI positive group and LVI negative group.The predictive nomogram of LVI included the age,histological grade,MRI reported T stage and radiomic signature.The AUC was 0.84(95%CI,0.73~0.94)in the training cohort,which was 0.81(95%CI,0.62~1.00)in the validation cohort.Conclusion:MRI-based radiomic nomogram could be helpful for the prediction of LVI preoperatively in rectal cancer patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.97