布兰顿推论主义语义学:皮尔士古典实用主义的当代回响  

Robert Brandom’s Inferential Semantics:A Contemporary Echo of Pierce’s Classical Pragmatism

作　　者：车向前 刘利民[2] Che Xiang-qian;Liu Li-min(School of Foreign Studies,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’an 710119,China;School of Foreign Languages and Cultures,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610064,China)

机构地区：[1]西北工业大学外国语学院,西安710119 [2]四川大学外国语学院,成都610064

出　　处：《外语学刊》2021年第4期107-113,共7页Foreign Language Research

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费项目“明末儒耶对话的文化间性阐释及其当代价值研究”(G2020KY05101);陕西省社科界重大理论与现实问题研究项目“陕西省中华地理自然标识的文化符号表征与形象传播研究”(2021ND0374)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：布兰顿秉承皮尔士关于"符号/语言在推论关系中获得语义内容"的基本立场,将其深入发展到推论实践活动:通过强调推论活动及其遵守的规范条件对于意义理解的构成作用,他使语义学建立在语用实践之中,在对皮尔士意义效用观的呼应中强力推进实用主义对于语义学的构建;他的规范语用观不仅与皮尔士规范科学同样关注逻辑对于隐含表达清晰化的作用,还特别聚焦于人证明和能给出理由证明某推论的能力,这是对皮尔士"逻辑作为规律科学是信念的稳定确立"思路的具体化和发扬。布兰顿推论主义语义学将古典实用主义容纳在分析哲学语义计划之中进行创造性的融合,这种分析的实用主义进路为分析哲学与实用主义的发展带来了新动力。Adhering to Peirce’s basic position that semantic content of symbol or language lies in the inferential relations, Robert Brandom developed it into inferential practices: by emphasizing the role of inferential activities and their normative conditions to the understanding of meaning, he formed the inferential semantics based on the pragmatism in the echo of Peirce’s notion of meaning as utility;His normative pragmatics not only concerns the function of logic in clearing the implicit expression as Peirce’s normative science, but focuses on the human’s ability of giving and asking for reasons in inferences’ proving. This is the elaboration of Peirce’s thought that "logic may be defined as the science of the laws of the stable establishment of beliefs". Inferential semantics, as approach of analytical pragmatism, creatively integrates classical pragmatism and analytical philosophy, thus sheds light on the development of both analytical philosophy and pragmatism.

关 键 词：布兰顿 皮尔士 推论主义语义学 古典实用主义 规范语用学 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]