第三人撤销之诉的原告适格研究  

A Study on the Plaintiff′s Eligibility in the Suit of the Third Party Discharging the Judgement

作　　者：郭宇燕[1] 孟楠 GUO Yuyan;MENG Nan(School of Law, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

机构地区：[1]太原科技大学法学院,山西太原030024

出　　处：《山西高等学校社会科学学报》2021年第8期34-38,共5页Social Sciences Journal of Universities in Shanxi

基　　金：2020年山西省哲学社会科学规划课题“山西非物质文化遗产保护的检察公益诉讼现状梳理与研究”(2020YJ122)。

摘　　要：我国第三人撤销之诉的确立,在一定程度上遏制了虚假诉讼、恶意诉讼的出现,但是对于具体原告的适格类型和适格范围规定并不明确,因此理论上出现了各种争议,实践的具体操作中也存在着原告适格范围过窄、原告适格认定标准不一、缺乏原告滥诉惩罚措施等问题。因此,应当在肯定第三人为适格原告的基础上,将案外第三人纳入适格原告范围,同时应当根据请求权的不同将适格原告类型进行明确区分。The establishment of the third party discharging the judgement in China has curbed the emergence of false litigation and malicious litigation to a certain extent,but the provisions on the eligibility type and scope of specific plaintiffs are not clear,so various disputes have arisen in theory.In the specific operation of practice,there are also problems such as the narrow scope of the plaintiff′s qualifications,the different standards for determining the plaintiff′s qualifications,and the lack of punitive measures for the plaintiff′s abuse of prosecution.Therefore,on the basis of affirming that the third party is a qualified plaintiff,the third party outside the case should be included in the scope of the qualified plaintiff.At the same time,the types of qualified plaintiffs should be clearly distinguished according to different claims.

关 键 词：原告适格 有独立请求权第三人 无独立请求权第三人 案外第三人 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]