检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈刚[1] 张焰平[1] 叶乐平[1] 付冲 周春燕 张世栋[1] CHEN Gang;ZHANG Yanping;YE Leping;FU Chong;ZHOU Chunyan;ZHANG Shidong(Department of Gastroenterology,Anqing Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University,Anqing 246000,Anhui,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学附属安庆医院消化内科,安徽安庆246000
出 处:《山东大学学报(医学版)》2021年第7期68-73,共6页Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
基 金:2020年度安徽医科大学临床科学基金项目(2020xkj242)。
摘 要:目的探讨造影增强超声内镜(CE-EUS)联合超声内镜引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)对胰腺占位的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2017年1月~2020年12月175例胰腺占位患者的临床资料,以手术、穿刺病理或随访结果为金标准,符合入组要求的患者有132例,其中行增强CT和/或增强MRI检查组有55例,行EUS检查组有40例,行CE-EUS联合EUS-FNA组有37例,比较三种检查方式在诊断胰腺占位中的价值。结果 55例胰腺占位行增强CT和/或增强MRI检查结果显示良性13例,恶性42例,敏感度79.49%(31/39)、特异度56.25%(9/16)、阳性预测值81.58%(31/38)、阴性预测值52.94%(9/17)、准确率72.73%(40/55);40例胰腺占位行EUS检查显示结果良性13例,恶性27例,敏感度80.00%(24/30)、特异度60.00%(6/10)、阳性预测值85.71%(24/28)、阴性预测值50.00%(6/12)、准确率75.00%(30/40);37例胰腺占位行CE-EUS联合EUS-FNA检查结果显示良性14例,恶性23例,敏感度93.94%(31/33)、特异度75.00%(3/4)、阳性预测值96.87%(31/32)、阴性预测值60.00%(3/5)、准确率91.89%(34/37)。胰腺癌在CE-EUS下主要表现为不均匀的点状或棒状的低增强模式,在CE-EUS引导下选择在低增强区域行FNA,可提高穿刺的阳性率。结论 CE-EUS联合EUS-FNA可提高胰腺占位诊断的准确率,值得临床推广。Objective To explore the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography(CE-EUS) combined with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration(EUS-FNA) for pancreatic cancer. Methods The clinical data of 175 patients with pancreatic space-occupying lesions treated during Jan. 2017 and Dec. 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the results of surgery and puncture pathology or follow-up data, 132 patients met the inclusion requirements, including 55 patients who received enhanced CT and/or enhanced MRI, 40 patients who received EUS examination, and 37 patients who received CE-EUS combined with EUS-FNA. The value of the three methods in the diagnosis of pancreatic masses were compared. Results The results of enhanced CT and/or enhanced MRI showed 13 benign cases and 42 malignant cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 79.49%(31/39), 56.25%(9/16), 81.58%(31/38), 52.94%(9/17), and 72.73%(40/55), respectively. EUS showed 13 benign cases and 27 malignant cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 80.00%(24/30), 60.00%(6/10), 85.71%(24/28), 50.00%(6/12), and 75.00%(30/40), respectively. CE-EUS combined with EUS-FNA showed 14 benign cases and 23 malignant cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 93.94%(31/33), 75.00%(3/4), 96.87%(31/32), 60.00%(3/5), and 91.89%(34/37), respectively. Pancreatic masses showed uneven spots or rod-like low enhancement mode under CE-EUS, and FNA in the low enhancement area could improve the positive rate of puncture. Conclusion CE-EUS combined with EUS-FNA can improve the diagnostic accuracy of pancreatic masses, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3