中文简版共同反刍问卷在1354名护生中应用的信效度评价  

Reliability and validity of Co-rumination Questionnaire in 1354 college nursing students

作　　者：张云雪 解子惠 吕高荣 申世玉 厉萍 ZHANG Yunxue;XIE Zihui;LYU Gaorong;SHEN Shiyu;LI Ping(School of Nursing and Rehabilitation,Cheeloo College of Medicine,Shandong University,Jinan 250012,Shandong,China;Jinan Vocational College of Nursing,Jinan 250102,Shandong,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学齐鲁医学院护理与康复学院,山东济南250012 [2]济南护理职业学院,山东济南250102

出　　处：《山东大学学报（医学版）》2021年第7期85-90,96,共7页Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(81773296)。

摘　　要：目的为评估护生的共同反刍水平,对共同反刍问卷(CRQ)进行汉化和修订,探讨其因素结构,并评估其信度和效度。方法征得原量表作者同意后,对英文版CRQ进行汉化。选取1354名山东省护理院校学生施测,用于调查个体在双向人际关系中过多探讨自身或者对方问题的共同反刍行为,并分析中文版CRQ的信效度。结果中文简版共同反刍问卷(CRQ-9)共9个条目;单维模型主要拟合指标良好(卡方自由度比值、渐进残差均方和平方根、适配度指数、调整后适配度指数、比较适配指数、增值适配指数以及非规准适配指数分别为2.584、0.048、0.986、0.965、0.989、0.989、0.978);CRQ得分与焦虑、抑郁、观点采择和个人痛苦均呈低度正相关(r为0.195~0.315,P均<0.001);Cronbachα系数为0.875,Guttman折半信度系数为0.899(P<0.01)。结论CRQ-9与原量表的框架构想一致,具有良好的信效度,可用于我国护生群体中共同反刍水平的评估。Objective To assess co-rumination of college nursing students,translate the English version of Co-rumination Questionnaire(CRQ)into Chinese and revise it,and evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale.Methods After translating the English version of CRQ with the permission of the author of the original English scale,totally 1354 nursing students completed the Chinese version of CRQ for investigating co-rumination in which individuals excessively discussed personal problems within a dyadic relationship.Then the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CRQ were tested.Results The simplified Chinese version of 9-item Co-rumination Questionnaire(CRQ-9)was obtained.The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting degree of the single-dimensional model was good,withχ2/df and root mean square error of approximation(RMSEA)being 2.584 and 0.048,respectively,and goodness-of-fit index(GFI),adjusted goodness-of-fit index(AGFI),comparative fit index(CFI),incremental fit index(IFI),and Tacker-Lewis index(TLI)being more than 0.900.The score of CRQ-9 was positively correlated with anxiety,depression,perspective taking and personal distress(r=0.195-0.315,all P<0.001).Cronbachαcoefficient was 0.875 and Guttman split-half reliability was 0.899(P<0.01).Conclusion The single factor structure of CRQ-9 is consistent with the original scale and CRQ-9 has good reliability and validity,and can be generalized to evaluate co-rumination of Chinese college nursing students.

关 键 词：护生 共同反刍 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R181[医药卫生—流行病学]