刑事诉讼证据法与刑法构成要件的关系  

The Relationship Between the Evidence Law of Criminal Procedure and the Constitutional Elements of Criminal Law

作　　者：李金珂 LI Jin-ke(School of Law,Yunnan University,Kunming 650504,China)

机构地区：[1]云南大学法学院,昆明650504

出　　处：《陕西行政学院学报》2021年第3期57-60,共4页Journal of Shaanxi Academy of Governance

摘　　要：证据是将某行为认定为犯罪行为的事实根据,从目前学界的态度和倾向来看,证据与犯罪之间的关系存在较为显著的割裂,就算是专门针对定罪而进行过的研究,大多也是有意回避艰涩的事实认定,而聚焦于法律适用。然而定罪一方面是事实评价,另一方面是法律评价,二者相辅相成,不可偏废。任何证据都无法架空事实而生成法律适用功能,以事实认定的相关问题为出发点,以犯罪构成理论为分析工具,对我国的刑事证据理论进行解构和分析,将定罪的有关理论延伸到“刑事一体化”理论范畴中,可为司法实践提供有用的参考借鉴。Evidence is the factual basis for identifying a certain behavior as a crime.From the attitude and tendency of the current academic circles,the relationship between evidence and crime is significantly separated.Even the researches on conviction are deliberately intended to avoid the difficult fact identification and focus on the application of law.However,conviction,on the one hand,is the evaluation of fact;on the other hand,it is the legal evaluation,both of which are consistent with each other and can’t be biased.Any evidence can’t overhead the fact and generate the function of law application.Starting from the relevant issues of fact determination,this paper reconstructs and analyzes the theory of criminal evidence in China with the theory of crime constitution as the analysis tool,and extends the theory of conviction to the theory of“criminal integration”,which can provide useful reference for judicial practice.

关 键 词：刑事证据法 刑事诉讼法 犯罪构成 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]