违法性认识与故意认识因素的判断同一性论证  

On the Identity of Illegal Cognition and Intentional Cognition

作　　者：刘方可 LIU Fang-ke(School of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 410005,China)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭410005

出　　处：《青海师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第3期57-61,共5页Journal of Qinghai Normal University（Social Sciences）

基　　金：湘潭大学研究生科研创新项目“专门矫治教育研究”(XDCX2021B042)。

摘　　要：明知是故意的认识因素,认识内容应严格限定在客观构成要件要素上。分则明知的含义与总则明知无实质差别,只是认识内容有所特指。分则明知与总则明知是部分与整体的关系。在违法性的判断上应坚持违法是客观的,责任是主观的观点,构成要件符合性判断过程不仅是形式违法性判断过程,也是明知判断过程。行为人主观上是否有明知,伴随第一阶层的判断结束而结束。行为是否具有法益侵害性等实质违法性认识属于价值判断,是第二阶层解决的问题,不属于明知的认识内容。The cognitive content of knowingly intentional cognitive factors should be strictly limited to the objective constituent elements.There is no substantial difference between the meaning of the specific knowledge and the general knowledge,but the content of the knowledge has a special point.Specific knowledge and general knowledge are the relationship between part and whole.On the judgment of illegality,we should stick to the view that illegality is objective and liability is subjective.The process of conformance judgment of constituent elements is not only the process of formal illegality judgment,but also the process of knowing.Whether the actor has subjective knowledge or not ends with the end of the judgment of the first class.Whether the behavior has the infringement of legal interest and other substantial illegality cognition belongs to the value judgment,is the second class to solve the problem,does not belong to the knowledge content.

关 键 词：明知 形式违法性 实质违法性 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]