刑事补强证据规则的认知现状--基于268份调查问卷的分析  

The Cognitive Status of Criminal Corroboration Requirement:Analysis Based on 268 Questionnaires

作　　者：赵飞龙 李思宜 ZHAO Feilong;LI Siyi(Law School,Xi'an University of Finance and Economics,Xi'an,Shaanxi,710061 China;Youth Volunteer Action Guidance Center of Shantou,Shantou,Guangdong,515000 China)

机构地区：[1]西安财经大学法学院,陕西西安710061 [2]汕头市青年志愿者行动指导中心,广东汕头515000

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2021年第7期85-97,共13页Journal of Leshan Normal University

基　　金：最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题“认罪认罚后被告人反悔研究”(GJ2019C30)。

摘　　要：在实践运行中,主体认知为实践提供了先决条件。刑事补强证据规则认知的问卷测试结果显示,超过半数的实务人员对刑事补强证据规则有所了解。对该规则有所了解的实务人员在认知上主要存在两个方面的偏差:就刑事补强证据规则中的主证据而言,被考察者对主证据类型的选择,既与其对主证据属性的选择存在矛盾,也与其对刑事补强证据规则性质归属的选择存在矛盾。就刑事补强证据规则中的补强证据而言,被考察者对补强证据类型的选择与其对补强证据属性的选择存在矛盾。In practice,subjective cognition provides a prerequisite for practice.Through the questionnaire test,more than half of the practitioners are familiar with the criminal corroboration requirement.There are two main deviations in the understanding of practitioners who know this rule:As far as the primary evidence is concerned,the selection of the type of primary evidence is not only contradict with the selection of its nature,but also contradict with the selection of the rule's nature.As far as the corroborative evidence is concerned,the selection of the type of corroborative evidence is contradict with the selection of its nature.

关 键 词：刑事补强证据规则 整体性认知 适用可能性 结构性认知 认知偏差 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]