从模糊到清晰:一个政协提案的历程  

From Vagueness to Clarity:the Course of A CPPCC Proposal

作　　者：刘亚平[1] 苏娇妮 LIU Ya-ping;SU Jiao-ni(School of Public Affairs,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院,广东广州510275

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第4期13-25,共13页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(20AZD048);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(17JJD790002)。

摘　　要：在政协提案办理过程中,承办单位的办复态度与行为直接影响提案办理工作的推进及最终走向。然而,现实中各行政组织对同一议题存在回复和解读差异。基于2019年构建大湾区食品安全标准体系的全国政协提案办理的案例分析,发现提案办理工作是一个从模糊逐步走向清晰的过程,提案本身的模糊属性既是政策企业家汇聚资源、建立支持联盟的主要策略,亦赋予行政组织解读提案的自主性空间。提案的成功办理有赖于行政组织从中找到共同的利好空间,为创造更大的收益“蛋糕”而积极融入和解读,继而推动提案办理工作。值得注意的是,提案办成也是各方战略联盟的建成过程,是方案明确的过程。政策企业家高度依赖行政组织的技术性和细节性支持,而那些机构地位弱、有拓展利好需要的专业性行政组织反而更有意愿且能为方案清晰化落地指明具体可行方向,在为提案者增加可选择的实施方案的同时,原本模糊的提案内涵得以清晰化。The attitude and response,in handling CPPCC proposals,of the contractor directly affect the promotion and final trend of proposal handling.However,in reality,administrative organizations bear different responses and interpretations to the same topic.The proposal handling,this study finds based on the case analysis of the CPPCC proposal handling of building the food safety standard system in Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area in 2019,experiences a shift from vagueness to clarity,and the vagueness of the proposal itself not only serves as the main strategy for policy entrepreneurs to gather resources and establish support alliances,but also provides administrative organizations with the autonomy to interpret the proposal.The successful handling lies in the administrative organization’s search of a common favorable space,active integration and interpretation for more benefits,thus promoting the proposal handling.It is worth noting that the completion of the proposal is also the process of building the strategic alliance of all parties and that of clarifying the scheme.Policy entrepreneurs highly rely on the technical and detailed support of administrative organizations,while those professional administrative organizations with weak institutional status and the need to expand are more willing and can point out the specific and feasible direction for the clear implementation of the scheme.The original vague connotation of the proposal can be clarified while adding alternative implementation schemes for the proponents.

关 键 词：政协提案 提案回复 部门差异 政策企业家 食品安全 

分 类 号：D63-31[政治法律—政治学]