教唆未遂犯处罚原则的反思与突破  

On the Reflection and the Breakthrough of the Principle of Punishment for Attempted Instigator

作　　者：张篮芝 ZHANG Lanzhi(School of Law, Hunan Normal University, Changsha Hunan 410006, China)

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,长沙410006

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第4期16-21,共6页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：传统教唆未遂犯处罚原则是指将教唆未遂犯当作被教唆的罪的预备犯进行处罚,另根据《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十九条第二款规定对其从轻或者减轻处罚。该原则存在违背罪刑法定原则、处刑失调以及扩大处罚范围等问题。教唆未遂犯具有侵犯法益的危险且处罚教唆未遂犯符合刑事政策要求且十分必要。应以分则中明确规定的教唆型犯罪作为处罚教唆未遂犯的边界,并以其所触犯的教唆型犯罪罪名定罪,将该条款作为刑法分则教唆型犯罪的法定从宽情节解决处刑失调问题。此外,应对“被教唆人没有犯被教唆的罪”进行严格限定,以缩小处罚范围,且对被教唆人拒绝教唆原则上适用“但书”进行出罪。The traditional principle of punishment for attempted abettor refers to the punishing them as a preparatory offender for the abetting crime.In addition,according to the second paragraph of Article 29 of“The Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China”,the punishment is lighter or mitigated.The principle has some problems,such as violating the legal principle of crime,misadjustment of punishment and enlarging the scope of punishment.The attempted instigator is dangerous to infringe the legal interests and the punishment of the attempted instigator meets the requirements of criminal policy,so it is necessary to punish the attempted instigator.The crime of abettor type clearly stipulated in the sub rule should be taken as the boundary of punishing the attempted instigator,and convicted for the crime of instigation type,and the article should be regarded as the legal lenient circumstance of the crime of instigation in the criminal law to solve the problem of misadjustment of punishment.In addition,“those who being abetted did not commit the abetted crime”should be strictly limited to narrow the scope of punishment,and the“proviso”should be applied to the principle of the abetted person’s refusal to abet.

关 键 词：教唆未遂犯 处罚原则 教唆型犯罪 法定从宽情节 刑法 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]