世行《营商环境报告》数据在美国反倾销程序中的适用合理性研究  

Analysis on the rationality of the application of the world bank’s doing business report data in the U.S.anti-dumping procedure

作　　者：陈文清 CHEN Wenqing(Law School,Fudan University,Shanghai 200438,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200438

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2021年第8期160-172,共13页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基　　金：复旦-耶鲁国际合作项目“WTO体制下的国际贸易行政法”〔(04)纽教(文)证字960〕。

摘　　要：近年来,美国商务部将世界银行《营商环境报告》数据视为具有代表性、准确性、可依赖性的最佳可用信息,屡屡运用在对华反倾销行政程序中,导致我国企业承受了较高的反倾销税。《营商环境报告》数据在替代价值核算中的引入,很大程度上是美国商务部为我国专门设计的。该行为仅从法律属性维度实现了合理性论证,实际上完全背离于世行《营商环境报告》数据使用的方法论要求,使得数据的重大缺陷未能通过比较性使用等科学方法予以弥补。在警惕美方滥用行政自由裁量权的同时,我国海外企业可以借助国际贸易行政诉讼的武器积极应对,我国政府也应强化与“替代国”的贸易交往,在加强国内改革的基础上实现营商环境的协同发展。In recent years,the U.S.Department of Commerce regards the data from the world bank’s doing business report as the best available information with representativeness,accuracy and dependability,which has been repeatedly used in China’s anti-dumping administrative procedures,resulting in higher anti-dumping duties on Chinese enterprises.The introduction of business environment report data into alternative value accounting is largely designed by the Ministry of Commerce of U.S.for China.In fact,it completely deviates from the methodological requirements of data use in doing business report of the world bank,which makes the major defects of data not be compensated by scientific methods such as comparative use.China’s overseas enterprises can actively respond to the abuse of administrative discretion by the United States,our government should also strengthen trade exchanges with“substitute countries”and realize the coordinated development of business environment on the basis of strengthening domestic reform.

关 键 词：营商环境报告 反倾销 替代价值 方法论 跨境贸易 

分 类 号：DF976[政治法律—国际法学]