刑事缺席审判制度价值立场及其平衡  

The Value Position and Balance of Criminal Trial by Default System

作　　者：孟军[1] Meng Jun(Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《湖北警官学院学报》2021年第3期111-119,共9页Journal of Hubei University of Police

基　　金：司法部课题“正当程序视野下的刑事缺席审判法律制度研究”(18SFB2026)。

摘　　要：诉讼效率、实体公正、刑罚功能、起诉法定与有诉必审、相对合理主义构成刑事缺席审判制度容许性理论基础;程序公正、被追诉人人权保障、刑事诉讼构造形成刑事缺席审判制度限制性理论基础。刑事缺席审判是在动态平衡诉讼观指导下确立起来的法律制度,制度本身体现了司法公正与诉讼效率、实体公正与程序公正、惩罚犯罪与保障人权基本价值的冲突与平衡。Litigation efficiency,substantive justice,penalty function,legal prosecution and trial with litigation,relative rationalism constitute the theoretical basis of the rationality of criminal trial by default system.Procedural justice,the accused rights protection and the structure of criminal procedure determine the limitation of the criminal trial by default system.Criminal trial by default is a legal system established under the guidance of dynamic balance litigation concept.The system reflects the conflict and balance between judicial justice and litigation efficiency,substantive justice and procedural justice,punishment of crime and protection of human rights.

关 键 词：刑事诉讼 缺席审判 价值基础 刑事诉讼目的 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]