检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:葛先园[1] Ge Xianyuan(Law School,Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu Anhui 233030)
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2021年第3期12-15,共4页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
基 金:安徽省社科规划项目《行政诉讼法修订后实施效果研究》(项目编号:AHSKY2016D03)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:行政诉讼被告资格认定问题是长期困扰行政诉讼理论界与实务界的难题。以分层的构成要件来认定行政诉讼被告资格,是一条可行且符合立法本意的路径。在立案阶段,行政诉讼被告符合法定的形式要件,人民法院即应登记立案。到了审理阶段,行政诉讼被告不仅应当具备形式要件,还应当具备主体要件和行为要件,才是适格的被告。The qualification of defendant in administrative litigation is a difficult problem that has plagued the theoretical and practical circles of administrative litigation for a long time.It is a feasible path that conforms to the original intention of the legislation to determine the qualifications of administrative litigation defendants based on the constituent elements of stratification.At the stage of filing a case,the people's court should register and file the case if the defendant in the administrative litigation meets the statutory formal requirements.At the trial stage,the defendant in administrative litigation should not only meet the formal requirements,but also the subject requirements and behavior requirements,so as to be a qualified defendant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44