检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜宴林[1] DU Yan-lin(Jilin University School of Law,Changchun,130015)
机构地区:[1]吉林大学法学院,长春519015
出 处:《现代法学》2021年第4期63-72,共10页Modern Law Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大专项项目(17VHJ007);教育部人文社会科学专项项目(18JF210);国家社会科学基金重大项目(2015MZD042)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:从思想史来看,人权先后呈现出天赋以及反天赋论两重面孔,人权概念也呈现出道德概念和政治概念的大体区别。但历史上的两种主张都是建立在虚假的二元对立之上且很难有充足说服力的。只有实践唯物主义视域下的人权概念才是其该当的正解。新的时代,人权的理解和践行也该当进行相应的实践转向。From the point of view of the history of thought,the concept of human rights presents two faces of the theory of natural rights and Anti-natural rights successively,and the concept of human rights also presents the general difference between the moral concept and the political concept.However,both of them are based on false binary opposition and are difficult to be fully persuasive.Only the concept of human rights under the perspective of practical materialism is the proper solution.In the new era,the understanding and practice of human rights should also be changed accordingly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.83.94