江、李二氏《周易述补》证异  

On the Differences of Jiang Fan and Li Linsong’s Two Complement of Description of the Zhou Changes

作　　者：丰子翔 FENG Zi-xiang

机构地区：[1]北京大学中国语言文学系,北京100871

出　　处：《周易研究》2021年第3期21-30,共10页Studies of Zhouyi

摘　　要：江藩和李林松在撰写《周易述补》时,皆有借续补《周易述》之机来表达自己易学观点的目的,故而二书的内容和体例各有特色,且都与《周易述》有一定的差异。江氏《周易述补》时常抛弃《周易述》中的易说另立新解,却能继承不少《周易述》中的易例。李氏《周易述补》对《周易述》中的易说继承较多,但经常另行提出易例,不从《周易述》之旨。两种《周易述补》各有侧重,相形而不相掩,执二书对读,方能更好地补充《周易述》之未备。When Jiang Fan(1761-1831) and Li Linsong(1770-1827) wrote their Zhou yi shu bu(Supplement to the Description of the Zhou Changes), they both used the opportunity to express their own views on Yi studies. Therefore, the content and interpretive layouts of the two scholars have their own characteristics, and have some differences from the original Description of the Zhou Changes. In his book, Jiang tended to abandon the statement of the original Zhouyi shu and put forward new ideas, but he inherited many interpretive layouts from it. By comparison, Li inherited the statement of the Zhouyi shu a lot, but often put forward other interpretive layout, not following the purpose of the original one. The two Supplements have their own emphases, and they are not covered by each other. Only when the two books are read in pairs, can they better supplement the deficiency of the original Description of the Zhou Changes written by Hui Dong(1697-1758).

关 键 词：《周易述补》 江藩 李林松 惠栋 

分 类 号：B249.9[哲学宗教—中国哲学]