检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王聪 李晓东[1] 孔令章 李振山 王松茂[2] WANG Cong;LI Xiao-dong;KONG Ling-zhang;LI Zhen-shan;WANG Song-mao(School of Resources and Environmental Science,Xinjiang University,Urumqi 830046,Xinjiang,China;School of Tourism,Xinjiang University,Urumqi 830046,Xinjiang,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆大学资源与环境科学学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830046 [2]新疆大学旅游学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830046
出 处:《西北师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2021年第5期33-39,共7页Journal of Northwest Normal University(Natural Science)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目资助(416661110);新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金资助项目(2017D01C072)。
摘 要:选取兰新高铁沿线9个中小城市为研究对象,采用加权平均旅行时间测度可达性,利用GIS空间分析技术,对比兰新高铁开通前后可达性与旅游吸引力空间演变.选取旅游总收入、旅游总人数、星级酒店数量、A级景点数量、旅行社数量等旅游指标建立场强模型,评价旅游吸引力.通过分析可达性与吸引力的相关性评价旅游竞争力,得出以下结论:高铁开通后沿线城市呈现时空压缩效应,但从空间上呈现提升不均衡态势,乌鲁木齐成为区域可达性最优点,海东成为可达性最低点;兰新廊道中段城市成为区域旅游吸引力高值区,首尾城市旅游吸引力与其经济实力不吻合,部分中小城市旅游吸引力变化率处于负值状态,有进一步被边缘化的风险;通过可达性与旅游吸引力对比,将沿线城市分为“高-高”、“高-低”、“低-高”、“低-低”4种类型,针对以上4种类型城市提出促进兰新高铁沿线城市旅游业发展的策略.Nine small and medium-sized cities along the Lan-Xin high-speed rail(HSR)line were selected as the research objects.The weighted average travel time was used to measure the accessibility and GIS spatial analysis technology was used to compare the spatial evolution of accessibility and tourist attraction before and after the Lan-Xin HSR was opened.Tourism indicators such as total tourism revenue,total number of tourists,number of star-rated hotels,number of A-level attractions,and number of travel agencies were selected to establish field strength models and evaluate tourism attractiveness.By analyzing the correlation between accessibility and attractiveness to evaluate tourism competitiveness,the following conclusions are drawn:After the opening of the high-speed rail,cities along the route show a tourism compression effect,but they show an imbalance in space,Urumqi has the best advantage of a regional accessibility,and Haidong has the lowest point of accessibility;The city in the middle of the Lanxin Corridor has become a high-value area for regional tourism attraction,the tourism attraction of the head and tail cities does not match its economic strength;The change rate of tourism attraction of some small and medium cities is in a negative state,and there is a risk of further marginalization.Through the comparison of accessibility and tourist attraction,cities along the route can be divided into four types:“high-high”,“high-low”,“low-high”,and“low-low”,and some pointed suggestions are put forward in order to promote the tourism development of cities along the Lan-Xin HSR.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7