社会动机一致性与问责对群体决策的影响  

The Influence of Social Motivation Consistency and Accountability on Group Decision-Making

作　　者：王晓庄[1,2,3] 张皎霄 赵嘉妍 赵玥 安晓镜 Ngure Mary Muthoni[2] WANG Xiaozhuang;ZHANG Jiaoxiao;ZHAO Jiayan;ZHAO Yue;AN Xiaojing;NGURE Mary Muthoni(Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education,Academy of Psychology and Behavior,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387;Faculty of Psychology,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387;Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’Mental Development and Learning,Tianjin 300387;Tianjin Urban Construction Management&Vocation Technology College,Tianjin 300314;Department of Education Science,Xingtai University,Xingtai 054001)

机构地区：[1]教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津300387 [2]天津师范大学心理学部,天津300387 [3]学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室,天津300387 [4]天津城市建设管理职业技术学院,天津300134 [5]邢台学院教科部,邢台054001

出　　处：《心理与行为研究》2021年第4期528-534,共7页Studies of Psychology and Behavior

基　　金：天津市哲学社会科学规划课题(TJJX18-012)。

摘　　要：采用隐藏文档范式决策任务,探究群体成员社会动机一致性对决策的影响及问责的促进作用。实验1通过社会动机启动,考察全员合作、多数合作、多数利己、全员利己四种群体的信息分享及决策正确率。结果发现,合作动机成员比例越高,群体信息分享和决策质量越好,信息分享在成员社会动机与决策质量间起完全中介作用;少数利己成员的存在对合作成员的信息分享产生负面影响。实验2检验过程问责与结果问责对多数利己、全员利己群体决策的促进作用。结果发现,两种问责方式均促进了群体的信息分享与决策质量。本研究深化了社会动机影响群体决策的机制及促进途径。The present study aimed to explore the influence of social-motivation consistency among group members on decision-making and the promoting effect of accountability on decision-making by using the Hidden Profile Paradigm.Experiment 1 investigated the information sharing and the accuracy of group decision-making by priming the social motivation of individuals in four groups:all members cooperation,majority members cooperation,majority members self-interest,and all members self-interest.The results showed that the higher the proportion of members with cooperative motivation,the better the information sharing and decision-making.The information-sharing played a complete mediating effect between the proportion of members with cooperative motivation and the performance of decision-making.Moreover,the minority with self-interested motivation decreased the information sharing among cooperative members.Experiment 2 examined the effects of process accountability and outcome accountability on the facilitation of decision-making in two groups in which the majority had self-interested motivation,or full members had self-interested motivation.The results demonstrated that both kinds of accountability promoted the information share and improved the quality of decision-making.This study provided a deep understanding of the mechanism and the promotion approaches underlying the impact of social motivation consistency on group decision-making.

关 键 词：群体决策 社会动机 问责 隐藏文档范式 

分 类 号：B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学]