认罪认罚案件审级制度研究--兼以主体间性为视角  

Research on the Trial Level System of Chinses Plea Bargain--From the Perspective of Inter-subjectivity

作　　者：钱春 Qian Chun(School of law,Nanjing University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210093;Economic&Law School,Chaohu University,Chaohu,Anhui 238000)

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093 [2]巢湖学院经济与法学学院,安徽合肥238000

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2021年第5期114-122,共9页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：2020年江苏省社科基金项目“刑事缺席审判诉讼结构平衡机制研究”(项目编号:20FXC003);2021年安徽省法学会课题“认罪认罚从宽中的控审冲突与调适”(项目编号:2021YBKT-4)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：反悔权是对认罪认罚案件自愿性的保障,也是被追诉人上诉的动源。抗诉是对反悔权和一审法院未采纳控方量刑建议的对抗,而这种对抗性的矛盾始终存在,源于没有将认罪认罚特质贯穿至第二审程序中。在案例探析基础上对反悔权进行规范,对抗诉理由进行类型化,建立有因上诉制度,完善审级制度的机制等,有利于化解认罪认罚案件审级制度中的冲突,并以主体间性缓释诉讼公正和诉讼效率间的张力。The right of rescission is the voluntary guarantee of the Chinese plea bargain case,and also the source of appeal of the accused.Protest is against the right to rescission and refusing the the prosecution’s sentencing proposal by the first instance court.This contradiction always exists,which stems from the failure to penetrate the nature of plea bargain into the second instance procedure.Based on the case analysis,the right of rescission should be standardized,the reasons for the protest should be classified,the system of appeal for reasons should be established,,and the construction of the system mechanism of trial level should be improved.In this way,the conflicts in the trial level system of plead,bargainecan be resolved,andthe tension between justice and litigation efficiency can be reduced by the intersubjectivity.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 审级制度 有因上诉 抗诉理由 二审范围 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]