儿童是“好”的游戏者吗?——基于儿童哲学视域的反思  

Are Children “Good” Game Players: reflection Basedon the Perspective of Philosophy for Children

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:郭晓林 丘丽玲 GUO Xiaolin;QIU Liling(School of Philosophy and Social Development,Guizhou University,Guiyang,Guizhou,China,550025)

机构地区:[1]贵州大学哲学与社会发展学院,贵州贵阳550025

出  处:《贵州大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第5期30-35,121,共7页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)

基  金:贵州省社科规划课题青年项目“道德发生学视角下的王阳明伦理思想研究”(18GZQN11)。

摘  要:游戏是由游戏形式、规则和游戏者构成的。人本质上就是游戏者,因为游戏不仅体现了人的生物属性,也体现了其精神属性,人的游戏性是人性从单一的生物性进展到丰富的精神性的重要动力。所以,人作为游戏者,反映了人与游戏的本质关系。儿童作为潜在的成人,也是天然的游戏者,甚至是最活跃的游戏者,他们在游戏中被建构,也彰显了游戏的本质以及人在游戏中的自由。但儿童似乎并不是“好”的游戏者,因为其尚缺乏理性、在游戏中主要是被动地被建构、且要想实现“玩”以成人还必须以“学”以成人为原则。所以,对于儿童这个“游戏者”,必要且正确的引导、规范与限制,在现实层面不可或缺。Game is composed of game form,rules and players.Human beings are essentially game players,becausegames not only reflect the biological attributes of human beings,but also their spiritual attributes.Human gameness isan important driving force for human nature to progress from a single biological nature to a more diverse spiritualnature.Therefore,man as a player reflects the essential relationship between human beings and game.As potentialadults,children are also natural players,even the most active players.They are constructed in the game,demonstratingthe essence of the game and the freedom of human beings in the game.However,it seems that children are not“good” players,because they are not rational,passively constructed,and if they want to “be adults” in “play”,theyshould follow the principle of “learn to be adults”.Therefore,for children as “players”,necessary and correctguidance,norms and restrictions are indispensable in reality.

关 键 词:游戏 游戏者 理性 

分 类 号:B-4[哲学宗教]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象